Within neighborhood
43
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Hollywood Eviction Risk: Lower , Brookfield
Tract 17031815701 · Cook County, IL · pop 3,835 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
With a score of 3/10, tract 17031815701 in the Hollywood area of Riverside, IL reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,835 residents. The severe-burden share is 57%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 3%
Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units1,453
Renter share6.5%
SVI overall0.19
Poverty rate7.9%
Median income$154,696
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
3
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
12
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Brookfield and the region
Centroid at 41.8367, -87.8111 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hollywood scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Brookfield
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
7.9% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Brookfield
2.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Brookfield
3.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Brookfield
2.9
How Hollywood compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 19
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 12%Socioeconomic
- 63%Household composition
- 48%Racial/ethnic minority
- 16%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 79%Grade B
- 20%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 86Total filings over 15 yrs
- 2.76%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.4%Peak (2012)
- 7Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 250% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Hollywood. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.8%Housing insecurity
- 4.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.3%Food insecurity
- 6.3%SNAP enrollment
- 4.6%Transit barriers
- 6.1%No health insurance
- 12.2%Frequent mental distress
- 20.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hollywood
Against the Cook County average of 6.1, this tract reads safer for landlords by 3.1 points. Against Cook County at 45.6%, 57% of renters here are cost-burdened. The clearest offset is economic stress at 2/10.
Running hot, local political climate reads 7.8/10. On the high side, regional political climate reads 7.5/10. Food insecurity runs 8.3% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 6.3% against 15.2% nationally. Court records carry 86 eviction filings across 15 observed years.
Filings peaked in 2012 at 5.4% of renter households. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Chicago. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 2.8% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
At 7% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031815701
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031815701?
Census tract 17031815701 in the Hollywood neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031815701?
7.9% of residents in tract 17031815701 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,835.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031815701?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 19th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 63th, minority 48th, housing 16th.
Q4
Is tract 17031815701 considered part of Hollywood?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031815701 fall within Hollywood (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031815701?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 86 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031815701 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.76% of renter households, peaking at 5.4% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 17031815701 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 17031815701 compare to Brookfield overall?
Tract 17031815701 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Brookfield at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Brookfield; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 17031815701 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Brookfield
Top eight tracts in Brookfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related