Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #37,857 of 84,120 nationally

Palos Park Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 17031823801 · Cook County, IL · pop 5,376 · 21% of tract blocks fall in Palos Park

Census tract 17031823801 is in Palos Park, Illinois. It has a population of 5,376 and an eviction-risk score of 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). 71% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 66% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $2,185/month against a median household income of $121,063 — roughly 22% rent-to-income at the medians.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 4% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units2,143
Renter share15.4%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate5.7%
Median income$121,063

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank — 100th percentileBottomTop
#1 of 3 tracts In Palos Park
Very High
Within county
27 th percentile
Rank — 27th percentileBottomTop
#977 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Low
Within state
52 th percentile
Rank — 52th percentileBottomTop
#1,553 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Moderate
National
55 th percentile
Rank — 55th percentileBottomTop
#37,857 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Palos Park and the region

Centroid at 41.6976, -87.8775 · click any tract to drill in

Why Palos Park scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Palos Park
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
5.7% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$2,185 rent vs county FMR
7.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Palos Park
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Palos Park
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Palos Park
4.8

How Palos Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Palos Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.45.4This tracttract 823801Palos Park: 5.05.0Palos Parkparent cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.45.4Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 42

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C — Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org) — 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 47Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 1.21%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.5%Peak (2003)
  • 3Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 — 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 170318238012001: 4 filings (1.44/100 renter HHs)2002: 3 filings (1.08/100 renter HHs)2003: 7 filings (2.52/100 renter HHs)2004: 3 filings (1.08/100 renter HHs)2005: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2006: 4 filings (1.92/100 renter HHs)2007: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2008: 3 filings (1.44/100 renter HHs)2009: 2 filings (0.96/100 renter HHs)2010: 2 filings (0.60/100 renter HHs)2011: 7 filings (1.74/100 renter HHs)2012: 1 filings (0.25/100 renter HHs)2013: 4 filings (1.00/100 renter HHs)2014: 4 filings (1.00/100 renter HHs)2015: 3 filings (0.75/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 25% over the past 15 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Frequently asked

About tract 17031823801

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031823801?

Census tract 17031823801 in Palos Park scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 17031823801?

Median gross rent is $2,185/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 71% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 17031823801?

5.7% of residents in tract 17031823801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,376.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 17031823801?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 62th, minority 42th, housing 56th.

Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031823801?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 47 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 17031823801 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.21% of renter households, peaking at 2.5% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.

Q6

What share of households in tract 17031823801 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.1% also reported utility shutoff threats — a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

Q7

How does tract 17031823801 compare to Palos Park overall?

Tract 17031823801 scores 5.4/10 — higher than the parent city of Palos Park at 5.0/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Palos Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Q8

Was tract 17031823801 historically redlined?

Yes — this tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Palos Park

Top eight tracts in Palos Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related