Neighborhood · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally
Creekside Eviction Risk: Lower , Rolling Meadows
Tract 17031804108 ·
Cook County, IL · pop 4,577 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
The Creekside neighborhood of Rolling Meadows is where census tract 17031804108 sits, home to 4,577 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 4.9/10. That is riskier than about 36% of US census tracts.
About 33% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,704 a month against an average household income of $91,386 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 86% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28%Stable renters 58%Owners 14%
Tract context
Occupied units2,299
Renter share86.0%
SVI overall0.52
Poverty rate6.5%
Median income$91,386
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100th percentile
#1 of 2 tracts In Creekside
Very High
Within parent city
71th percentile
#5 of 15 tracts In Rolling Meadows
Elevated
Within county
17th percentile
#1,110 of 1,331 tracts In Cook County
Very Low
Within state
29th percentile
#2,320 of 3,263 tracts In Illinois
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rolling Meadows and the region
Centroid at 42.0749, -88.0508 · click any tract to drill in
Why Creekside scores 2.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rolling Meadows
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.5
State political climate
Illinois legislature & governorship
5.2
Economic stress
6.5% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,704 rent vs county FMR
4.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rolling Meadows
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rolling Meadows
7.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rolling Meadows
4.0
How Creekside compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 52
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
59%Socioeconomic
11%Household composition
75%Racial/ethnic minority
63%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
10.8%Housing insecurity
5.5%Utility-shutoff threat
12.3%Food insecurity
8.2%SNAP enrollment
6.3%Transit barriers
7.1%No health insurance
13.9%Frequent mental distress
16.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Creekside
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 7.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rolling Meadows, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Cook County average of 5.7 and below the Illinois statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 873 eviction filings here over 15 tracked years, with about 6.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 15.0% of renter households in 2008.
In CDC survey modeling, about 10.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 17031804108
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 17031804108?
Census tract 17031804108 in the Creekside neighborhood scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 17031804108?
Median gross rent is $1,704/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 17031804108?
6.5% of residents in tract 17031804108 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,577.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 17031804108?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 52th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 11th, minority 75th, housing 63th.
Q5
Is tract 17031804108 considered part of Creekside?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 17031804108 fall within Creekside (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 17031804108?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 873 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 17031804108 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.54% of renter households, peaking at 15.0% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 17031804108 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 17031804108 compare to Rolling Meadows overall?
Tract 17031804108 scores 2.5/10, lower than the parent city of Rolling Meadows at 4.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rolling Meadows; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Rolling Meadows
Top eight tracts in Rolling Meadows ranked by composite eviction-risk score.