Greenwood Eviction Risk: Lower

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.3/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 2/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.

15% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. SNAP participation runs 4.3% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 8.6% against 17.8% nationally. At $1,207 a month, rents run 8% under what the rest of Greenwood commands. That is riskier than roughly 31% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

At 20% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.3/10. Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $89,837, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.