Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,240 of 84,120 nationally

LaSalle Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , South Bend

Tract 18141002300 · St. Joseph County, IN · pop 1,257 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

The Moderate-tier score of 5.7/10 for census tract 18141002300 reflects conditions in the LaSalle Park area of South Bend, Indiana. On the national scale it ranks #29,504 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 47% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $657 a month while the average household earns $25,660 a year, roughly 31% of income at the averages. Renters make up 59% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 32% Owners 40%
Tract context
Occupied units627
Renter share59.2%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate48.3%
Median income$25,660

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 5 tracts In LaSalle Park
High
Within parent city
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 47 tracts In South Bend
High
Within county
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#7 of 82 tracts In St. Joseph County
Very High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#131 of 1,693 tracts In Indiana
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across South Bend and the region

Centroid at 41.6769, -86.2939 · click any tract to drill in

Why LaSalle Park scores 5.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from South Bend
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Indiana legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
48.3% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$657 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from South Bend
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from South Bend
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from South Bend
2.5

How LaSalle Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
LaSalle Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.55.5This tracttract 002300South Bend: 2.62.6South Bendparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 98

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 20Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 6.25%Avg annual filing rate
  • 6.3%Peak (2015)
  • 20Filings in 2015 (latest validated)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 130Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.54×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-02-01: 10 filings (3.64× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.62× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 10 filings (3.64× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (0.52× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-12-01: 4 filings (1.23× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-04-01: 5 filings (4.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2024-06-01: 5 filings (0.87× baseline)2024-07-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.36× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 4 filings (1.60× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (0.92× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Richmond, VA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within LaSalle Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in LaSalle Park

The score leans hardest on economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from South Bend eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the St. Joseph County average of 5.2 and above the Indiana statewide average of 4.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 31.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 27.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.54x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 18141002300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 18141002300?

Census tract 18141002300 in the LaSalle Park neighborhood scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 18141002300?

Median gross rent is $657/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 18141002300?

48.3% of residents in tract 18141002300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,257.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 18141002300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 100th, minority 95th, housing 69th.
Q5

Is tract 18141002300 considered part of LaSalle Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 18141002300 fall within LaSalle Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 18141002300?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 20 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 18141002300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.25% of renter households, peaking at 6.3% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 18141002300 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.54× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Richmond eviction risk, VA), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 18141002300 struggle to pay rent?

About 31.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 27.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 18141002300 compare to South Bend overall?

Tract 18141002300 scores 5.5/10, higher than the parent city of South Bend at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from South Bend eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 18141002300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 60% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in South Bend

Top eight tracts in South Bend ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related