Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally

Charlotte Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 19045001200 · Clinton County, IA · pop 3,992 · 4% of tract blocks fall in Charlotte

Census tract 19045001200 covers Charlotte in Clinton County, home to 3,992 residents. For landlords it grades 4.6/10, a moderate reading. On the national scale it ranks #62,262 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 29% of renter households, a moderate level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $896 a month against an average household income of $91,231 a year, roughly 12% of income at the averages. Renters make up 18% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 13% Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units1,552
Renter share18.2%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate8.5%
Median income$91,231

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Charlotte
Moderate
Within county
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 12 tracts In Clinton County
Low
Within state
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#533 of 896 tracts In Iowa
Moderate
National
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#61,757 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Charlotte and the region

Centroid at 41.9502, -90.3634 · click any tract to drill in

Why Charlotte scores 2.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Charlotte
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
Iowa legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
8.5% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$896 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Charlotte
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Charlotte
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Charlotte
6.0

How Charlotte compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Charlotte risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.82.8This tracttract 001200Charlotte: 2.52.5Charlotteparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.33.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 15

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 10Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 0.88%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.4%Peak (2004)
  • 1Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 190450012002003: 2 filings (0.68/100 renter HHs)2004: 4 filings (1.36/100 renter HHs)2005: 3 filings (1.10/100 renter HHs)2014: 1 filings (0.36/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Charlotte

The score leans hardest on housing court bias at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Charlotte, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Clinton County average of 5.0 and in line with the Iowa statewide average of 4.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 10 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 0.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.4% of renter households in 2004.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 19045001200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 19045001200?

Census tract 19045001200 in Charlotte scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 19045001200?

Median gross rent is $896/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 29% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 19045001200?

8.5% of residents in tract 19045001200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,992.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 19045001200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 36th, minority 13th, housing 17th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 19045001200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 10 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 19045001200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.88% of renter households, peaking at 1.4% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 19045001200 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 19045001200 compare to Charlotte overall?

Tract 19045001200 scores 2.8/10, higher than the parent city of Charlotte at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Charlotte; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related