Census Tract · Ranked #76,223 of 84,120 nationally
Rose Hill Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 20015020902 ·
Butler County, KS · pop 4,389 · 87% of tract blocks fall in Rose Hill
The Moderate-tier score of $1/10 for census tract 20015020902 reflects conditions in Rose Hill, Kansas. On the national scale it ranks #73,862 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
39% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,002 monthly, set against $98,673 in average yearly household income, roughly 12% of income at the averages. About 17% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.8
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%Stable renters 11%Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units1,518
Renter share17.5%
SVI overall0.28
Poverty rate0.9%
Median income$98,673
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Rose Hill
Moderate
Within county
11th percentile
#17 of 19 tracts In Butler County
Very Low
Within state
13th percentile
#723 of 829 tracts In Kansas
Very Low
National
9th percentile
#76,223 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rose Hill and the region
Centroid at 37.5717, -97.1333 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rose Hill scores 1.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rose Hill
4.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.9
State political climate
Kansas legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
0.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,002 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rose Hill
3.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rose Hill
4.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rose Hill
2.6
How Rose Hill compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 28
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.2%Housing insecurity
5.8%Utility-shutoff threat
8.2%Food insecurity
4.1%SNAP enrollment
5.0%Transit barriers
6.5%No health insurance
16.0%Frequent mental distress
26.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Rose Hill
The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 5.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rose Hill, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Butler County average of 4.3 and in line with the Kansas statewide average of 4.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 28th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
In CDC survey modeling, about 8.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 20015020902
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 20015020902?
Census tract 20015020902 in Rose Hill scores 1.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 20015020902?
Median gross rent is $1,002/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 20015020902?
0.9% of residents in tract 20015020902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,389.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 20015020902?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 28th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 43th, minority 31th, housing 42th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 20015020902 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 20015020902 compare to Rose Hill overall?
Tract 20015020902 scores 1.8/10, lower than the parent city of Rose Hill at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rose Hill; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.