Neighborhood · Ranked #65,113 of 84,120 nationally
Rosedale Eviction Risk: Lower , Roeland Park
Tract 20091050100 ·
Johnson County, KS · pop 4,466 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
Tract 20091050100, home to 4,466 residents in the Rosedale neighborhood of Roeland Park, scores 4.6/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 26% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 32% of renter households, a high level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,307 monthly, set against $85,036 in average yearly household income, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 35% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%Stable renters 24%Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units2,152
Renter share34.6%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate10.1%
Median income$85,036
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Rosedale
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Roeland Park
Moderate
Within county
84th percentile
#26 of 154 tracts In Johnson County
High
Within state
28th percentile
#597 of 829 tracts In Kansas
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Roeland Park and the region
Centroid at 39.0368, -94.6397 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rosedale scores 2.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Roeland Park
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Kansas legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
10.1% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,307 rent vs county FMR
4.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Roeland Park
4.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Roeland Park
7.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Roeland Park
5.1
How Rosedale compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 23
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
29%Socioeconomic
43%Household composition
39%Racial/ethnic minority
16%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
13%Grade A
1%Grade B
40%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
9.5%Housing insecurity
6.8%Utility-shutoff threat
9.1%Food insecurity
4.7%SNAP enrollment
5.8%Transit barriers
7.7%No health insurance
15.5%Frequent mental distress
25.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Rosedale
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 7.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Roeland Park eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Johnson County average of 3.9 and above the Kansas statewide average of 4.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 23rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 20091050100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 20091050100?
Census tract 20091050100 in the Rosedale neighborhood scores 2.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 20091050100?
Median gross rent is $1,307/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 20091050100?
10.1% of residents in tract 20091050100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,466.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 20091050100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 43th, minority 39th, housing 16th.
Q5
Is tract 20091050100 considered part of Rosedale?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 20091050100 fall within Rosedale (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 20091050100 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 20091050100 compare to Roeland Park overall?
Tract 20091050100 scores 2.6/10, higher than the parent city of Roeland Park at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Roeland Park eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 20091050100 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.