Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally
Starks Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 22019003601 · Calcasieu Parish, LA · pop 3,012 · 6% of tract blocks fall in Starks
Census tract 22019003601 covers part of Starks, LA, and scores 5.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. Severe burden reaches 33%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 70% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%
Stable renters 3%
Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units1,133
Renter share5.1%
SVI overall0.49
Poverty rate16.5%
Median income$51,551
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
80
th percentile
High
Within state
72
th percentile
Elevated
National
63
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Starks and the region
Centroid at 30.2509, -93.6111 · click any tract to drill in
Why Starks scores 5.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Starks
3.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.2
State political climate
Louisiana legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
16.5% poverty · this tract
4.1
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Starks
3.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Starks
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Starks
6.1
How Starks compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 49
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 72%Socioeconomic
- 20%Household composition
- 6%Racial/ethnic minority
- 54%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.5%Housing insecurity
- 9.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 19.3%Food insecurity
- 16.2%SNAP enrollment
- 9.7%Transit barriers
- 8.7%No health insurance
- 20.1%Frequent mental distress
- 41.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Starks
What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.6/10. 33% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Calcasieu Parish average of 43.1%. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.9/10.
Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.3/10. It sits 1.1 points above the Calcasieu Parish average of 4.0.
Nationally it ranks #31,049 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 5% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.4/10. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 22019003601
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 22019003601?
Census tract 22019003601 in Starks scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 22019003601?
16.5% of residents in tract 22019003601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,012.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 22019003601?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 49th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 72th, household 20th, minority 6th, housing 54th.
Q4
What share of households in tract 22019003601 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q5
How does tract 22019003601 compare to Starks overall?
Tract 22019003601 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Starks at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Starks; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Starks
Top eight tracts in Starks ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related