Neighborhood · Ranked #65,414 of 84,120 nationally
Exeter Green Eviction Risk: Lower , Pleasant Hills
Tract 24025303400 ·
Harford County, MD · pop 4,648 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
With a score of 3.1/10, tract 24025303400 in the Exeter Green area of Pleasant Hills, MD reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,648 residents. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.9/10.
Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%Stable renters 4%Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units1,816
Renter share6.4%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate6.2%
Median income$140,246
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Exeter Green
Moderate
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Pleasant Hills
Moderate
Within county
16th percentile
#50 of 59 tracts In Harford County
Very Low
Within state
8th percentile
#1,353 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Pleasant Hills and the region
Centroid at 39.4878, -76.3780 · click any tract to drill in
Why Exeter Green scores 3.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pleasant Hills
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
6.2% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$2,687 rent vs county FMR
8.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pleasant Hills
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pleasant Hills
2.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pleasant Hills
3.4
How Exeter Green compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 1
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
7%Socioeconomic
28%Household composition
23%Racial/ethnic minority
0%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
6.6%Housing insecurity
4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
7.0%Food insecurity
5.2%SNAP enrollment
4.4%Transit barriers
4.8%No health insurance
13.5%Frequent mental distress
22.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Exeter Green
At $2,687 a month, rents run 43% over what the rest of Pleasant Hills commands. The voucher gap is 36.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. 26% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Sitting well above the midpoint, supply constraint reads 8.7/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.5/10.
Against Harford County at 41.1%, 32% of renters here are cost-burdened. Against the Harford County average of 4.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.3 points.
Food insecurity runs 7.0% against 17.8% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 6.6% against 14.2% nationally. That is riskier than roughly 22% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
At 6% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 1.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the MD average is 5.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points cooler.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 24025303400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24025303400?
Census tract 24025303400 in the Exeter Green neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 24025303400?
Median gross rent is $2,687/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 24025303400?
6.2% of residents in tract 24025303400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,648.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 24025303400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 28th, minority 23th, housing 0th.
Q5
Is tract 24025303400 considered part of Exeter Green?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24025303400 fall within Exeter Green (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 24025303400 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 24025303400 compare to Pleasant Hills overall?
Tract 24025303400 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of Pleasant Hills at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pleasant Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.