Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,451 of 84,120 nationally

West Lanham Hills Eviction Risk: Elevated , New Carrollton

Tract 24033803613 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 7,294 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 24033803613 covers part of the West Lanham Hills area of New Carrollton, MD, and scores 6.5/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 7,294. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 10/10.

Risk score
6.5
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 36% Stable renters 36% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units2,610
Renter share72.1%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate9.0%
Median income$71,685

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In West Lanham Hills
Low
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In New Carrollton
Low
Within county
79 th percentile
Rank, 79th percentileLowHigh
#46 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
High
Within state
73 th percentile
Rank, 73rd percentileLowHigh
#398 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across New Carrollton and the region

Centroid at 38.9583, -76.8856 · click any tract to drill in

Why West Lanham Hills scores 6.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from New Carrollton
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
9.0% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,684 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from New Carrollton
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from New Carrollton
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from New Carrollton
5.4

How West Lanham Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
West Lanham Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.5This tracttract 8036135.9New Carrolltonparent city4.9Countyavg tract in county5.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 8,044Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 163.84%Avg annual filing rate
  • 177.4%Peak (2014)
  • 1,934Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 24033803613
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within West Lanham Hills. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in West Lanham Hills

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.1/10. On the high side, regional political climate reads 9/10.

The severe-burden share is 22%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. This is renter territory: 72% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

It sits 1.6 points above the Prince George's County average of 4.9. Housing insecurity runs 23.0% against 14.2% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 8,044 filings here across 4 tracked years.

Against Prince George's County at 45.6%, 50% of renters here are cost-burdened. Food insecurity runs 25.0% against 17.8% nationally. The worst year on record was 2014, when 177.4% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 163.8% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 82% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 9.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the MD average is 5.5, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033803613

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033803613?

Census tract 24033803613 in the West Lanham Hills neighborhood scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033803613?

Median gross rent is $1,684/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033803613?

9.0% of residents in tract 24033803613 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,294.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033803613?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 84th, household 87th, minority 97th, housing 91th.
Q5

Is tract 24033803613 considered part of West Lanham Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033803613 fall within West Lanham Hills (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033803613?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 8,044 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033803613 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 163.84% of renter households, peaking at 177.4% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033803613 struggle to pay rent?

About 23.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033803613 compare to New Carrollton overall?

Tract 24033803613 scores 6.5/10, higher than the parent city of New Carrollton at 5.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from New Carrollton; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in New Carrollton

Top eight tracts in New Carrollton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related