Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #26,446 of 84,120 nationally

Highland Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Summerfield

Tract 24033803002 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 2,493 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

How risky is the Highland Park area of Summerfield for landlords? Census tract 24033803002 scores 7.3/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than roughly 97% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 53% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 53% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,908 a month against an average household income of $69,025 a year, roughly 33% of income at the averages. Renters make up 31% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 15% Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units1,072
Renter share31.4%
SVI overall0.79
Poverty rate10.9%
Median income$69,025

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Highland Park
Moderate
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Summerfield
Elevated
Within county
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#54 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
High
Within state
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#362 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Summerfield and the region

Centroid at 38.9033, -76.8954 · click any tract to drill in

Why Highland Park scores 4.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Summerfield
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
10.9% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$1,908 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Summerfield
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Summerfield
9.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Summerfield
5.9

How Highland Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Highland Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.94.9This tracttract 803002Summerfield: 6.56.5Summerfieldparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,487Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 110.25%Avg annual filing rate
  • 125.0%Peak (2012)
  • 241Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 240338030022011: 416 filings (118.18/100 renter HHs)2012: 440 filings (125.00/100 renter HHs)2014: 390 filings (110.80/100 renter HHs)2016: 241 filings (87.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 42% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Highland Park

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Summerfield, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and above the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,487 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 110.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 125.0% of renter households in 2012.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 79th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033803002

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033803002?

Census tract 24033803002 in the Highland Park neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033803002?

Median gross rent is $1,908/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033803002?

10.9% of residents in tract 24033803002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,493.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033803002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 92th, minority 95th, housing 61th.
Q5

Is tract 24033803002 considered part of Highland Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033803002 fall within Highland Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033803002?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,487 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033803002 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 110.25% of renter households, peaking at 125.0% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033803002 struggle to pay rent?

About 24.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033803002 compare to Summerfield overall?

Tract 24033803002 scores 4.9/10, lower than the parent city of Summerfield at 6.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Summerfield; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Summerfield

Top eight tracts in Summerfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related