Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,797 of 84,120 nationally
Plymouth Village Historic District Eviction Risk: High , North Plymouth
Tract 25023530200 · Plymouth County, MA · pop 4,418 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
Tract 25023530200 sits in the Plymouth Village Historic District area of North Plymouth, MA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.1/10. Against the Plymouth County average of 5.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 3.9 points.
Risk score
9.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32%
Stable renters 26%
Owners 42%
Tract context
Occupied units2,035
Renter share58.7%
SVI overall0.65
Poverty rate18.3%
Median income$71,205
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
100
th percentile
Very High
Within state
95
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across North Plymouth and the region
Centroid at 41.9753, -70.6806 · click any tract to drill in
Why Plymouth Village Historic District scores 9.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from North Plymouth
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Massachusetts legislature & governorship
6.2
Economic stress
18.3% poverty · this tract
4.6
Supply constraint
$1,787 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from North Plymouth
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from North Plymouth
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from North Plymouth
8.1
How Plymouth Village Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 65
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 78%Socioeconomic
- 38%Household composition
- 30%Racial/ethnic minority
- 64%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 16Total filings over 1 yrs
- 1.97%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.0%Peak (2016)
- 16Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Plymouth Village Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.4%Housing insecurity
- 8.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 14.6%Food insecurity
- 18.3%SNAP enrollment
- 8.9%Transit barriers
- 5.0%No health insurance
- 19.7%Frequent mental distress
- 32.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Plymouth Village Historic District
Severe burden reaches 35%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.6/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.7/10. Against Plymouth County at 46.6%, 55% of renters here are cost-burdened. Running hot, housing-court posture reads 8.1/10.
The poverty rate is 18%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. The filing record is not thin: 16 evictions over 1 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2016, when 2.0% of renter households were served.
In a typical year about 2.0% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #3,797 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 6.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the MA average is 6.2, so this tract runs 2.9 points hotter.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 25023530200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 25023530200?
Census tract 25023530200 in the Plymouth Village Historic District neighborhood scores 9.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 25023530200?
Median gross rent is $1,787/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 25023530200?
18.3% of residents in tract 25023530200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,418.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 25023530200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 65th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 78th, household 38th, minority 30th, housing 64th.
Q5
Is tract 25023530200 considered part of Plymouth Village Historic District?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 25023530200 fall within Plymouth Village Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 25023530200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 16 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 25023530200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.97% of renter households, peaking at 2.0% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 25023530200 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 25023530200 compare to North Plymouth overall?
Tract 25023530200 scores 9.1/10, higher than the parent city of North Plymouth at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from North Plymouth; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related