Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #23,808 of 84,120 nationally

Regent Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Eastpointe

Tract 26099258700 · Macomb County, MI · pop 3,020 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Tract 26099258700 sits in the Regent Park area of Eastpointe eviction risk, MI, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.5/10. Population here is 3,020. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.7/10.

Risk score
5.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 23% Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units937
Renter share36.0%
SVI overall0.75
Poverty rate15.9%
Median income$57,188

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Regent Park
Very Low
Within parent city
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 10 tracts In Eastpointe
Moderate
Within county
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 243 tracts In Macomb County
Very High
Within state
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#494 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Eastpointe and the region

Centroid at 42.4608, -82.9538 · click any tract to drill in

Why Regent Park scores 5.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Eastpointe
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
15.9% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$1,296 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Eastpointe
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Eastpointe
6.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Eastpointe
7.1

How Regent Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Regent Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.5This tracttract 2587004.3Eastpointeparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 75

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Regent Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Regent Park

21% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Against the Macomb County average of 3.9, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.6 points. 36% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Macomb County average of 44.2%.

Food insecurity runs 30.1% against 17.8% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 24.0% against 14.2% nationally. On the high side, housing-court posture reads 7.1/10.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 72nd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 7.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the MI average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.3 points hotter.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. Average gross rent is $1,296, close to the Eastpointe average.

Annual rent works out to 27% of average household income of $57,188. 36% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 26099258700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26099258700?

Census tract 26099258700 in the Regent Park neighborhood scores 5.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26099258700?

Median gross rent is $1,296/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26099258700?

15.9% of residents in tract 26099258700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,020.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26099258700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 75th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 80th, household 91th, minority 80th, housing 27th.
Q5

Is tract 26099258700 considered part of Regent Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26099258700 fall within Regent Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 26099258700 struggle to pay rent?

About 24.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 26099258700 compare to Eastpointe overall?

Tract 26099258700 scores 5.5/10, higher than the parent city of Eastpointe at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Eastpointe eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 26099258700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 99% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Eastpointe

Top eight tracts in Eastpointe ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related