Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #53,267 of 84,120 nationally

Fraser Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 26099254100 · Macomb County, MI · pop 4,396

In Fraser, census tract 26099254100 scores 6.1/10 for eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #18,831 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 49% of renter households, a severe level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $892 a month against an average household income of $53,164 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 29% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14% Stable renters 15% Owners 71%
Tract context
Occupied units2,063
Renter share29.1%
SVI overall0.59
Poverty rate11.9%
Median income$53,164

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Fraser
Elevated
Within county
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#100 of 243 tracts In Macomb County
Elevated
Within state
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#1,617 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Moderate
National
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#53,267 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fraser and the region

Centroid at 42.5460, -82.9634 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fraser scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fraser
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.6
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
11.9% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$892 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fraser
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fraser
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fraser
5.6

How Fraser compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fraser risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.33.3This tracttract 254100Fraser: 3.03.0Fraserparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 59

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fraser

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fraser, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Macomb County average of 5.5 and above the Michigan statewide average of 5.7. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 59th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 26099254100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26099254100?

Census tract 26099254100 in Fraser scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 26099254100?

Median gross rent is $892/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 26099254100?

11.9% of residents in tract 26099254100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,396.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 26099254100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 59th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 64th, household 60th, minority 31th, housing 52th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 26099254100 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 26099254100 compare to Fraser overall?

Tract 26099254100 scores 3.3/10, higher than the parent city of Fraser at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fraser; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fraser

Top eight tracts in Fraser ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related