Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #49,882 of 84,120 nationally

Port Riverwalk Eviction Risk: Lower , Coon Rapids

Tract 27003050606 · Anoka County, MN · pop 1,886 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

With a score of 5.9/10, tract 27003050606 in Port Riverwalk in Coon Rapids ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 1,886 residents. It lands near the 71st percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 53% of renter households, a severe level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,116 a month while the average household earns $55,987 a year, roughly 24% of income at the averages. Renters make up 50% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 27% Stable renters 24% Owners 49%
Tract context
Occupied units885
Renter share50.3%
SVI overall0.73
Poverty rate14.0%
Median income$55,987

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Port Riverwalk
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 16 tracts In Coon Rapids
Very High
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#19 of 90 tracts In Anoka County
High
Within state
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#712 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Coon Rapids and the region

Centroid at 45.1444, -93.3044 · click any tract to drill in

Why Port Riverwalk scores 3.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Coon Rapids
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
14.0% poverty · this tract
3.5
Supply constraint
$1,116 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Coon Rapids
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Coon Rapids
5.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Coon Rapids
5.9

How Port Riverwalk compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Port Riverwalk risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.53.5This tracttract 050606Coon Rapids: 4.94.9Coon Rapidsparent cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 73

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 115Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 6.28%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.9%Peak (2009)
  • 31Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2012
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270030506062009: 38 filings (8.86/100 renter HHs)2010: 22 filings (4.73/100 renter HHs)2011: 24 filings (5.03/100 renter HHs)2012: 31 filings (6.50/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 18% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Port Riverwalk

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 7.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Coon Rapids eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Anoka County average of 5.3 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 115 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 6.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 8.9% of renter households in 2009.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27003050606

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27003050606?

Census tract 27003050606 in the Port Riverwalk neighborhood scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27003050606?

Median gross rent is $1,116/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27003050606?

14.0% of residents in tract 27003050606 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,886.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27003050606?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 73th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 58th, household 80th, minority 29th, housing 85th.
Q5

Is tract 27003050606 considered part of Port Riverwalk?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27003050606 fall within Port Riverwalk (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27003050606?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 115 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 27003050606 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.28% of renter households, peaking at 8.9% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27003050606 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27003050606 compare to Coon Rapids overall?

Tract 27003050606 scores 3.5/10, lower than the parent city of Coon Rapids at 4.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Coon Rapids eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Coon Rapids

Top eight tracts in Coon Rapids ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related