Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,113 of 84,120 nationally

Riverdale Eviction Risk: Lower , Anoka

Tract 27003050505 · Anoka County, MN · pop 5,621 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

The Riverdale area of Anoka is where census tract 27003050505 sits, home to 5,621 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 5.3/10. That is riskier than roughly 49% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 38% of renter households, a high level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,242 a month against an average household income of $89,815 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 33% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 20% Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units2,020
Renter share32.9%
SVI overall0.61
Poverty rate3.1%
Median income$89,815

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Riverdale
Moderate
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Anoka
Low
Within county
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#32 of 90 tracts In Anoka County
Elevated
Within state
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#951 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Anoka and the region

Centroid at 45.2208, -93.3756 · click any tract to drill in

Why Riverdale scores 2.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Anoka
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
3.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,242 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Anoka
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Anoka
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Anoka
5.5

How Riverdale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Riverdale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.62.6This tracttract 050505Anoka: 4.94.9Anokaparent cityCounty: 2.42.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 61

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 107Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 4.82%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.5%Peak (2010)
  • 20Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2012
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270030505052009: 28 filings (6.65/100 renter HHs)2010: 30 filings (5.46/100 renter HHs)2011: 29 filings (4.23/100 renter HHs)2012: 20 filings (2.92/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 29% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Riverdale

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Anoka, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Anoka County average of 5.3 and in line with the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 61st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27003050505

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27003050505?

Census tract 27003050505 in the Riverdale neighborhood scores 2.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27003050505?

Median gross rent is $1,242/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27003050505?

3.1% of residents in tract 27003050505 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,621.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27003050505?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 61th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 88th, minority 44th, housing 78th.
Q5

Is tract 27003050505 considered part of Riverdale?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27003050505 fall within Riverdale (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27003050505?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 107 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 27003050505 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.82% of renter households, peaking at 5.5% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27003050505 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27003050505 compare to Anoka overall?

Tract 27003050505 scores 2.6/10, lower than the parent city of Anoka at 4.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Anoka; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Anoka

Top eight tracts in Anoka ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related