Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #41,206 of 84,120 nationally

Riverdale Eviction Risk: Moderate , Anoka

Tract 27003050505 · Anoka County, MN · pop 5,621 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi

With a score of 4.5/10, tract 27003050505 in the Riverdale area of Anoka, MN reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,621. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.

Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 20% Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units2,020
Renter share32.9%
SVI overall0.61
Poverty rate3.1%
Median income$89,815

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Riverdale
Moderate
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Anoka
Low
Within county
66 th percentile
Rank, 66th percentileLowHigh
#31 of 90 tracts In Anoka County
Elevated
Within state
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#589 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Anoka and the region

Centroid at 45.2208, -93.3756 · click any tract to drill in

Why Riverdale scores 4.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Anoka
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
3.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,242 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Anoka
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Anoka
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Anoka
5.5

How Riverdale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Riverdale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.54.5This tracttract 050505Anoka: 4.64.6Anokaparent cityCounty: 4.24.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 61

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 107Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 4.82%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.5%Peak (2010)
  • 20Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2012
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270030505052009: 28 filings (6.65/100 renter HHs)2010: 30 filings (5.46/100 renter HHs)2011: 29 filings (4.23/100 renter HHs)2012: 20 filings (2.92/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 29% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Riverdale

Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.5/10. The severe-burden share is 16%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 2.4/10.

Against Anoka County at 43.4%, 38% of renters here are cost-burdened. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 107 filings here across 4 tracked years.

Filings peaked in 2010 at 5.5% of renter households. In a typical year about 4.8% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #41,206 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 6.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $89,815, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 27003050505

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27003050505?

Census tract 27003050505 in the Riverdale neighborhood scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27003050505?

Median gross rent is $1,242/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27003050505?

3.1% of residents in tract 27003050505 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,621.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27003050505?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 61th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 29th, household 88th, minority 44th, housing 78th.
Q5

Is tract 27003050505 considered part of Riverdale?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27003050505 fall within Riverdale (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27003050505?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 107 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 27003050505 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.82% of renter households, peaking at 5.5% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27003050505 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27003050505 compare to Anoka overall?

Tract 27003050505 scores 4.5/10, right in line with the parent city of Anoka at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Anoka; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Anoka

Top eight tracts in Anoka ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related