Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Ham Lake Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 27003050215 · Anoka County, MN · pop 4,331

27003050215 is a census tract in Ham Lake, MN. It scores 3/10 for landlords. It is home to 4,331 residents. The severe-burden share is 40%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 5% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,489
Renter share12.2%
SVI overall0.14
Poverty rate2.4%
Median income$134,563

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Ham Lake
Very Low
Within county
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#72 of 90 tracts In Anoka County
Low
Within state
18 th percentile
Rank, 18th percentileLowHigh
#1,230 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Very Low
National
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Ham Lake and the region

Centroid at 45.2315, -93.2395 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ham Lake scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Ham Lake
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
2.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,233 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ham Lake
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ham Lake
2.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ham Lake
5.4

How Ham Lake compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ham Lake risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 050215Ham Lake: 3.63.6Ham Lakeparent cityCounty: 4.24.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 14

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 36Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 5.54%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.2%Peak (2009)
  • 9Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2012
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270030502152009: 12 filings (7.19/100 renter HHs)2010: 9 filings (6.16/100 renter HHs)2011: 6 filings (3.53/100 renter HHs)2012: 9 filings (5.29/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 25% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ham Lake

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. Against Anoka County at 43.4%, 55% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.1/10. Running cool, tenant-organizing strength reads 2.1/10.

It sits 1.2 points below the Anoka County average of 4.2. SNAP participation runs 5.4% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 8.7% against 17.8% nationally.

The filing record is not thin: 36 evictions over 4 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2009, when 7.2% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 5.5% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 12% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Against average income of $134,563, annual rent is just 11%. Statewide the MN average is 4.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points cooler.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 27003050215

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27003050215?

Census tract 27003050215 in Ham Lake scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27003050215?

Median gross rent is $1,233/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27003050215?

2.4% of residents in tract 27003050215 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,331.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27003050215?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 14th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 15th, minority 29th, housing 55th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27003050215?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 36 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 27003050215 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.54% of renter households, peaking at 7.2% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 27003050215 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 27003050215 compare to Ham Lake overall?

Tract 27003050215 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Ham Lake at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ham Lake; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Ham Lake

Top eight tracts in Ham Lake ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related