Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally
Lindstrom Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 27025110501 · Chisago County, MN · pop 3,975 · 50% of tract blocks fall in Lindstrom
How risky is Lindstrom in Chisago County for landlords? Census tract 27025110501 scores 3.7/10, the Lower tier. That is riskier than about 8% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 26% of renter households, a moderate level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $832 a month against an average household income of $95,750 a year, roughly 10% of income at the averages. About 13% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%
Stable renters 10%
Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units1,607
Renter share13.3%
SVI overall0.35
Poverty rate4.1%
Median income$95,750
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
33
th percentile
Low
Within state
21
th percentile
Low
National
11
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lindstrom and the region
Centroid at 45.4045, -92.8373 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lindstrom scores 1.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Lindstrom
4.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.5
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
4.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$832 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lindstrom
3.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lindstrom
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lindstrom
3.7
How Lindstrom compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 35
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 21%Socioeconomic
- 28%Household composition
- 14%Racial/ethnic minority
- 79%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 14Total filings over 2 yrs
- 2.37%Avg annual filing rate
- 2.6%Peak (2010)
- 6Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.1%Housing insecurity
- 4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.9%Food insecurity
- 5.2%SNAP enrollment
- 5.2%Transit barriers
- 5.6%No health insurance
- 14.1%Frequent mental distress
- 26.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lindstrom
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 4.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lindstrom, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Chisago County average of 4.3 and below the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 35th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 27025110501
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27025110501?
Census tract 27025110501 in Lindstrom scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 27025110501?
Median gross rent is $832/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 27025110501?
4.1% of residents in tract 27025110501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,975.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 27025110501?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 28th, minority 14th, housing 79th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27025110501?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 14 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 27025110501 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.37% of renter households, peaking at 2.6% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 27025110501 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 27025110501 compare to Lindstrom overall?
Tract 27025110501 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Lindstrom at 4.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lindstrom; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Lindstrom
Top eight tracts in Lindstrom ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related