Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #73,892 of 84,120 nationally

Stacy Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 27025110402 · Chisago County, MN · pop 4,811 · 28% of tract blocks fall in Stacy

Eviction risk in Stacy centers on tract 27025110402, which scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 4,811 residents. That is riskier than roughly 32% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 51% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 6% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,188 monthly, set against $95,243 in average yearly household income, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 5% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 2% Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units1,791
Renter share4.6%
SVI overall0.28
Poverty rate5.4%
Median income$95,243

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Stacy
Moderate
Within county
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#8 of 13 tracts In Chisago County
Moderate
Within state
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#1,148 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Low
National
12 th percentile
Rank, 12th percentileLowHigh
#73,892 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Stacy and the region

Centroid at 45.4230, -92.9703 · click any tract to drill in

Why Stacy scores 2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Stacy
4.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.5
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
5.4% poverty · this tract
1.3
Supply constraint
$1,188 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Stacy
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Stacy
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Stacy
6.1

How Stacy compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Stacy risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.02.0This tracttract 110402Stacy: 4.64.6Stacyparent cityCounty: 2.52.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 28

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 21Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 7.55%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.1%Peak (2010)
  • 7Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Stacy

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Stacy, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Chisago County average of 4.3 and in line with the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 28th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27025110402

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27025110402?

Census tract 27025110402 in Stacy scores 2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27025110402?

Median gross rent is $1,188/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27025110402?

5.4% of residents in tract 27025110402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,811.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27025110402?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 28th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 30th, household 45th, minority 20th, housing 30th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27025110402?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 21 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 27025110402 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.55% of renter households, peaking at 10.1% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 27025110402 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 27025110402 compare to Stacy overall?

Tract 27025110402 scores 2/10, lower than the parent city of Stacy at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Stacy; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related