Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally

Oak Hill Eviction Risk: Lower , St. Louis Park

Tract 27053122500 · Hennepin County, MN · pop 3,521 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

Here is how census tract 27053122500, in the Oak Hill area of St. Louis Park, looks to a landlord: a 4.6/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 3,521. On the national scale it ranks #62,562 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

27% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,829 monthly, set against $111,125 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 34% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 25% Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units1,551
Renter share33.8%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate6.6%
Median income$111,125

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Oak Hill
Moderate
Within parent city
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#10 of 15 tracts In St. Louis Park
Low
Within county
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#171 of 329 tracts In Hennepin County
Moderate
Within state
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#740 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across St. Louis Park and the region

Centroid at 44.9430, -93.3745 · click any tract to drill in

Why Oak Hill scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from St. Louis Park
7.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
6.6% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,829 rent vs county FMR
5.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from St. Louis Park
3.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from St. Louis Park
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from St. Louis Park
4.1

How Oak Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Oak Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.43.4This tracttract 122500St. Louis Park: 4.94.9St. Louis Parkparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 36

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 58Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 1.76%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.6%Peak (2010)
  • 7Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270531225002009: 5 filings (1.16/100 renter HHs)2010: 17 filings (2.57/100 renter HHs)2011: 12 filings (1.69/100 renter HHs)2012: 17 filings (2.39/100 renter HHs)2013: 7 filings (0.99/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 40% over the past 5 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 49Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.7Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.87×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (2.27× baseline)2022-09-01: 4 filings (6.45× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-11-01: 3 filings (7.89× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (4.55× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (25.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (3.23× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (2.27× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (3.57× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (8.33× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (2.27× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (2.68× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (8.33× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (1.61× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (2.63× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Minneapolis-Saint Paul, MN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Oak Hill

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 5.9/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from St. Louis Park eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hennepin County average of 5.6 and below the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 58 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 1.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.6% of renter households in 2010.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27053122500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27053122500?

Census tract 27053122500 in the Oak Hill neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27053122500?

Median gross rent is $1,829/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27053122500?

6.6% of residents in tract 27053122500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,521.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27053122500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 90th, minority 38th, housing 34th.
Q5

Is tract 27053122500 considered part of Oak Hill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27053122500 fall within Oak Hill (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27053122500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 58 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27053122500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.76% of renter households, peaking at 2.6% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 27053122500 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.87× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Minneapolis eviction risk-Saint Paul, MN), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 27053122500 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 27053122500 compare to St. Louis Park overall?

Tract 27053122500 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of St. Louis Park at 4.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from St. Louis Park eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in St. Louis Park

Top eight tracts in St. Louis Park ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related