Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #9,878 of 84,120 nationally

Faribault Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 27131070901 · Rice County, MN · pop 5,983 · 95% of tract blocks fall in Faribault

In Faribault, census tract 27131070901 scores 5.6/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 61% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 65% of renter households, a severe level, and 39% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,242 a month against an average household income of $47,048 a year, roughly 32% of income at the averages. About 32% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
6.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 11% Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units2,122
Renter share32.5%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate21.1%
Median income$47,048

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 7 tracts In Faribault
High
Within county
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 16 tracts In Rice County
Very High
Within state
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#86 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Very High
National
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#9,878 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Faribault and the region

Centroid at 44.3141, -93.2904 · click any tract to drill in

Why Faribault scores 6.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Faribault
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
21.1% poverty · this tract
5.3
Supply constraint
$1,242 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Faribault
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Faribault
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Faribault
7.3

How Faribault compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Faribault risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.26.2This tracttract 070901Faribault: 5.15.1Faribaultparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 88

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 95Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 2.93%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.1%Peak (2013)
  • 11Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 271310709012013: 34 filings (4.11/100 renter HHs)2014: 27 filings (3.26/100 renter HHs)2015: 23 filings (2.78/100 renter HHs)2017: 11 filings (1.57/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 68% over the past 4 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Faribault

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Faribault eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Rice County average of 4.5 and above the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 15.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 88th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27131070901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27131070901?

Census tract 27131070901 in Faribault scores 6.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27131070901?

Median gross rent is $1,242/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27131070901?

21.1% of residents in tract 27131070901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,983.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27131070901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 94th, minority 46th, housing 97th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27131070901?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 95 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 27131070901 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.93% of renter households, peaking at 4.1% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 27131070901 struggle to pay rent?

About 15.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 27131070901 compare to Faribault overall?

Tract 27131070901 scores 6.2/10, higher than the parent city of Faribault at 5.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Faribault eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Faribault

Top eight tracts in Faribault ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related