Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally

Echo Lake Eviction Risk: Lower , Mahtomedi

Tract 27163070303 · Washington County, MN · pop 4,978 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

With a score of 3.4/10, tract 27163070303 in the Echo Lake area of Mahtomedi, MN reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,978. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 9.4/10.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 8% Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units1,831
Renter share13.3%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$127,135

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Echo Lake
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Mahtomedi
Very Low
Within county
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#42 of 59 tracts In Washington County
Low
Within state
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#1,040 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mahtomedi and the region

Centroid at 45.0422, -92.9770 · click any tract to drill in

Why Echo Lake scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mahtomedi
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,755 rent vs county FMR
5.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mahtomedi
9.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mahtomedi
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mahtomedi
6.1

How Echo Lake compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Echo Lake risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.4This tracttract 0703034.0Mahtomediparent city4.1Countyavg tract in county4.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 17

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 8Total filings over 3 yrs
  • 0.76%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.1%Peak (2012)
  • 4Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2012
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 27163070303
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Echo Lake

The severe-burden share is 30%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10. Against Washington County at 44.0%, 36% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Housing insecurity runs 5.3% against 14.2% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 8 filings here across 3 tracked years.

Adults with no health insurance runs 4.2% against 11.3% nationally. It sits 0.7 points below the Washington County average of 4.1. Filings peaked in 2012 at 1.1% of renter households.

In a typical year about 0.8% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #59,654 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 13% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Statute speed, court posture and rent-regulation exposure are inherited from Mahtomedi rather than measured on these blocks; the economic and supply components are the tract-level part of the score. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Against average income of $127,135, annual rent is just 17%.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 27163070303

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27163070303?

Census tract 27163070303 in the Echo Lake neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27163070303?

Median gross rent is $1,755/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27163070303?

2.5% of residents in tract 27163070303 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,978.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27163070303?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 55th, minority 19th, housing 29th.
Q5

Is tract 27163070303 considered part of Echo Lake?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27163070303 fall within Echo Lake (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27163070303?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 8 eviction filings across 3 validated years in tract 27163070303 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.76% of renter households, peaking at 1.1% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27163070303 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27163070303 compare to Mahtomedi overall?

Tract 27163070303 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Mahtomedi at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mahtomedi; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mahtomedi

Top eight tracts in Mahtomedi ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related