Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally

Columbus Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Kansas City

Tract 29095015401 · Jackson County, MO · pop 2,386 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 29095015401 covers part of the Columbus Park area of Kansas City, MO, and scores 5.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,386 residents. The dominant input is economic stress at 10/10.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 65% Owners 5%
Tract context
Occupied units935
Renter share95.5%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate61.0%
Median income$13,616

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Columbus Park
Very Low
Within parent city
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 163 tracts In Kansas City
High
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 227 tracts In Jackson County
Very High
Within state
96 th percentile
Rank, 96th percentileLowHigh
#68 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kansas City and the region

Centroid at 39.1020, -94.5663 · click any tract to drill in

Why Columbus Park scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Kansas City
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
61.0% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$438 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Kansas City
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Kansas City
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Kansas City
4.0

How Columbus Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Columbus Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.45.4This tracttract 015401Kansas City: 4.04.0Kansas Cityparent cityCounty: 4.24.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 99

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 180Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 6.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.39×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.24× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (0.41× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2022-04-01: 5 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.10× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (0.53× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 6 filings (1.26× baseline)2023-07-01: 5 filings (0.49× baseline)2023-08-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (0.32× baseline)2023-12-01: 9 filings (1.89× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-02-01: 8 filings (1.52× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (0.71× baseline)2024-06-01: 8 filings (1.68× baseline)2024-07-01: 7 filings (0.68× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (0.62× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2024-10-01: 9 filings (1.38× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (0.42× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2025-01-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-02-01: 9 filings (1.71× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.21× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (0.94× baseline)2025-06-01: 6 filings (1.26× baseline)2025-07-01: 5 filings (0.49× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (0.46× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2025-12-01: 6 filings (1.26× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Kansas City, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Columbus Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Columbus Park

At $438 a month, rents run 65% under what the rest of Kansas City commands. SNAP participation runs 55.4% against 15.2% nationally.

Housing insecurity runs 43.0% against 14.2% nationally. The poverty rate is 61%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. 96% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.

Set annual rent against average income of $13,616 and the ratio lands at 39%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Running cool, supply constraint reads 1/10. Cost burden runs roughly one in three here against 43.0% across Jackson County.

On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10. Severe burden reaches 16%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Against the Jackson County average of 4.2, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.2 points. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 70th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.9/10. Statewide the MO average is 3.8, so this tract runs 1.6 points hotter.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 29095015401

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29095015401?

Census tract 29095015401 in the Columbus Park neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29095015401?

Median gross rent is $438/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29095015401?

61.0% of residents in tract 29095015401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,386.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29095015401?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 97th, minority 84th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 29095015401 considered part of Columbus Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29095015401 fall within Columbus Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 29095015401 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.39× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Kansas City eviction risk, MO), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 29095015401 struggle to pay rent?

About 43.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 37.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 29095015401 compare to Kansas City overall?

Tract 29095015401 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of Kansas City at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Kansas City eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 29095015401 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 94% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Kansas City

Top eight tracts in Kansas City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related