Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Big Sky Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 30057000102 · Madison County, MT · pop 1,783 · 13% of tract blocks fall in Big Sky

With a score of 3/10, tract 30057000102 in Big Sky, MT reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,783. Cost burden runs 52% here against 32.7% across Madison County.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 7% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units827
Renter share15.2%
SVI overall0.38
Poverty rate5.7%
Median income$80,245

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Big Sky
Very High
Within county
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Madison County
Low
Within state
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#232 of 319 tracts In Montana
Low
National
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Big Sky and the region

Centroid at 45.0366, -111.6194 · click any tract to drill in

Why Big Sky scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Big Sky
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.0
State political climate
Montana legislature & governorship
1.7
Economic stress
5.7% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,794 rent vs county FMR
7.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Big Sky
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Big Sky
3.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Big Sky
6.0

How Big Sky compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Big Sky risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0001023.4Big Skyparent city3.5Countyavg tract in county3.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 38

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Big Sky

At $1,794 a month, rents run 105% over what the rest of Big Sky commands. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.4/10.

Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.7/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.7/10.

The voucher gap is 20.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Food insecurity runs 6.7% against 17.8% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 4.1% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 15% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 6%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

It tracks the Madison County average of 3.5 closely. Annual rent works out to 27% of average household income of $80,245.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 30057000102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30057000102?

Census tract 30057000102 in Big Sky scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 30057000102?

Median gross rent is $1,794/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 30057000102?

5.7% of residents in tract 30057000102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,783.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 30057000102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 38th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 15th, minority 24th, housing 78th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 30057000102 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 30057000102 compare to Big Sky overall?

Tract 30057000102 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Big Sky at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Big Sky eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Big Sky

Top eight tracts in Big Sky ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related