Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Laurel Glen Eviction Risk: Lower , Four Corners

Tract 30031000502 · Gallatin County, MT · pop 8,119 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 30031000502 covers part of the Laurel Glen area of Four Corners, MT, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Average gross rent is $1,930, 44% above the Four Corners average.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 12% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units2,957
Renter share19.7%
SVI overall0.09
Poverty rate3.0%
Median income$125,068

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Laurel Glen
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Four Corners
Moderate
Within county
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#22 of 26 tracts In Gallatin County
Very Low
Within state
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#232 of 319 tracts In Montana
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Four Corners and the region

Centroid at 45.6927, -111.1273 · click any tract to drill in

Why Laurel Glen scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Four Corners
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Montana legislature & governorship
1.7
Economic stress
3.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,930 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Four Corners
2.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Four Corners
4.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Four Corners
2.9

How Laurel Glen compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Laurel Glen risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.0This tracttract 0005023.2Four Cornersparent city4.2Countyavg tract in county3.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 9

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 0.42%Avg annual filing rate
  • 0.4%Peak (2000)
  • 1Filings in 2001 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2002
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 30031000502
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Laurel Glen

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.4/10.

On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.7/10. SNAP participation runs 3.3% against 15.2% nationally. Against the Gallatin County average of 4.2, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.2 points.

Housing insecurity runs 5.1% against 14.2% nationally. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 2 filings here across 2 tracked years.

Severe burden reaches 9%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. The worst year on record was 2000, when 0.4% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 0.4% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 20% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Social vulnerability reads 1.8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 30031000502

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30031000502?

Census tract 30031000502 in the Laurel Glen neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 30031000502?

Median gross rent is $1,930/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 30031000502?

3.0% of residents in tract 30031000502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 8,119.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 30031000502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 9th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 8th, minority 6th, housing 41th.
Q5

Is tract 30031000502 considered part of Laurel Glen?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 30031000502 fall within Laurel Glen (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 30031000502?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 30031000502 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.42% of renter households, peaking at 0.4% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 30031000502 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 30031000502 compare to Four Corners overall?

Tract 30031000502 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Four Corners at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Four Corners eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Four Corners

Top eight tracts in Four Corners ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related