Skip to content
Neighborhood · Billings, MT

Ironwood Eviction Risk: Lower

1 census tracts · pop 7,425 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3/10 · range 3–3

Ironwood maps to a single census tract in Billings, MT, population 7,425. The Eviction Risk Score is 3/10, in the Lower tier. Cost burden runs 51% against 29.6% citywide, putting Ironwood 21.2% over its own city.

At $1,617 a month, rents sit 42% over what the rest of Billings commands. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure, at 1/10.

Well under the midpoint is economic stress, at 1/10. Running cool is tenant-organizing strength, at 2/10.

The voucher gap is 17.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which shows up as churn rather than arrears. SNAP participation is 3.2% of households versus 15.2% nationally.

5.0% of adults carry no health insurance against 11.3% nationally, a common route into sudden unpayable debt. Among the 15 mapped neighborhoods of Billings, it ranks #12 by risk, the lower third.

Only 9% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin here; price renewals off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. For a like-for-like read, Cameron Park and West Central score within a fraction of it.

Against average income of $152,029, annual rent is only 13%, a wide affordability cushion. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Because the boundary contains one tract, 3/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.

Risk score
3
Lower
1 tracts · population-weighted
Ironwood vs Billings How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
50.8% +72%
Billings: 29.6%
Average gross rent
$1,617 +42%
Billings: $1,138
Average HH income
$152,029 +112%
Billings: $71,855
Poverty rate
2.1% -80%
Billings: 10.6%
Renter share
9.3% -74%
Billings: 35.2%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Ironwood and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 3–3

Why Ironwood scores 3

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 1.7–1.7 across tracts
1.7
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 3.8–3.8 across tracts
3.8
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 3.0–3.0 across tracts
3.0
Rent control risk
51% of income on rent · Range 1.0–1.0 across tracts
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 2.5–2.5 across tracts
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
9% renter households · Range 2.0–2.0 across tracts
2.0
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 2.5–2.5 across tracts
2.5
Economic stress
2.1% below poverty line · Range 1.0–1.0 across tracts
1.0
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 6.8–6.8 across tracts
6.8
Risk score comparison

Ironwood vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Ironwood score vs. parent city, state, U.S.3.0IronwoodNeighborhood3.2Parent cityhost city3.7Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Ironwood

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
30111001801 3 7,425 51% $1,617
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 2

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 2%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 17%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 5%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 7%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Ironwood

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Ironwood

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Ironwood?

Ironwood scores 3/10 (Lower tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Ironwood compare to Billings overall?

Ironwood scores 0.2 points lower than Billings overall (3.2/10). Renters spend 51% of income on rent vs 30% citywide. Average rent: $1,617 vs $1,138.
Q3

What is the average rent in Ironwood?

Average gross rent in Ironwood is $1,617/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Ironwood residents are renters?

9% of Ironwood households are renter-occupied (vs 35% in Billings). The neighborhood has 7,425 residents.
Q5

Is Ironwood a high social-vulnerability area?

Ironwood sits in the 2nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (low vulnerability). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Ironwood for landlords?

Ironwood carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Billings as a whole (3.2/10), this neighborhood is in line with the citywide level.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Ironwood?

Ironwood has 7,805 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (93.9%), Other / Multiracial (4%), Hispanic / Latino (1.7%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Ironwood

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Billings

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Ironwood.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further