Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #8,912 of 84,120 nationally
Hastings Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 31001966100 · Adams County, NE · pop 2,385 · 86% of tract blocks fall in Hastings
For landlords sizing up Hastings, census tract 31001966100 carries a lower eviction-risk score of 3.9/10. That is riskier than about 10% of US census tracts.
60% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $755 a month while the average household earns $24,681 a year, roughly 37% of income at the averages. About 72% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
6.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 44%
Stable renters 29%
Owners 27%
Tract context
Occupied units1,075
Renter share72.2%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate30.7%
Median income$24,681
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
100
th percentile
Very High
Within state
100
th percentile
Very High
National
89
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Hastings and the region
Centroid at 40.5646, -98.3461 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hastings scores 6.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Hastings
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.0
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
30.7% poverty · this tract
7.7
Supply constraint
$755 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Hastings
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Hastings
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Hastings
2.0
How Hastings compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 99
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 93%Socioeconomic
- 96%Household composition
- 48%Racial/ethnic minority
- 99%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 41Total filings over 9 yrs
- 0.68%Avg annual filing rate
- 1.2%Peak (2012)
- 6Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 20% over the past 9 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 16.6%Housing insecurity
- 12.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 29.6%Food insecurity
- 27.6%SNAP enrollment
- 14.3%Transit barriers
- 20.4%No health insurance
- 16.7%Frequent mental distress
- 47.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hastings
What moves this score most is economic stress at 7.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Hastings eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Adams County average of 3.4 and in line with the Nebraska statewide average of 3.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 16.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 12.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 41 eviction filings here over 9 tracked years, with about 0.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.2% of renter households in 2012.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 31001966100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31001966100?
Census tract 31001966100 in Hastings scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 31001966100?
Median gross rent is $755/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 31001966100?
30.7% of residents in tract 31001966100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,385.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 31001966100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 96th, minority 48th, housing 99th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31001966100?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 41 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 31001966100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.68% of renter households, peaking at 1.2% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 31001966100 struggle to pay rent?
About 16.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 31001966100 compare to Hastings overall?
Tract 31001966100 scores 6.3/10, higher than the parent city of Hastings at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Hastings eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Hastings
Top eight tracts in Hastings ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related