1 census tracts · pop 5,199 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 4.4/10
· range 4.4–4.4
Cosgroves is a one-tract neighborhood of Lincoln, NE, population 5,199. The Eviction Risk Score is 4.4/10, in the Moderate tier. Cost burden runs 49% against 28.9% citywide, putting Cosgroves 20.0% over its own city.
Pulling the other way is rent-regulation exposure, at 1/10. The severe-burden share is 24%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay.
The filing record is not thin: 732 evictions logged in this tract. Running cool is eviction-process difficulty, at 3/10. The worst year on record was 2002, when filings touched 12.4% of renter households.
Well under the midpoint is housing-court posture, at 3/10. The most recent observed rate, 5.9% in 2016, is well off that peak. Among the 72 mapped neighborhoods of Lincoln, it ranks #24 by risk, the upper third.
Social vulnerability runs high at 8.5/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input. Average gross rent runs $1,067, close to the Lincoln average.
Annual rent works out to 23% of average household income of $55,521. 53% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Because the boundary contains one tract, 4.4/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.
Risk score
4.4
Moderate
1 tracts · population-weighted
Cosgroves vs LincolnHow this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority57%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport85%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab
Court-record eviction history in Cosgroves
Aggregated across 1 validated constituent tract. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
732Total filings (sum)
6.09%Avg annual filing rate
12.4%Peak year (2002)
5.86%Latest filed (2016)
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Cosgroves
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
14.6%Housing insecurity
10.2%Utility shutoff threat
20.3%Food insecurity
16.7%SNAP enrollment
13.7%No health insurance
31.7%Any disability
Frequently asked
About Cosgroves
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for Cosgroves?
Cosgroves scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2
How does Cosgroves compare to Lincoln overall?
Cosgroves scores 0.8 points higher than Lincoln overall (3.6/10). Renters spend 49% of income on rent vs 29% citywide. Average rent: $1,067 vs $1,086.
Q3
What is the average rent in Cosgroves?
Average gross rent in Cosgroves is $1,067/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4
What percentage of Cosgroves residents are renters?
53% of Cosgroves households are renter-occupied (vs 44% in Lincoln). The neighborhood has 5,199 residents.
Q5
Is Cosgroves a high social-vulnerability area?
Cosgroves sits in the 83rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (highly vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6
How safe is Cosgroves for landlords?
Cosgroves carries a moderate-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (4.4/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Lincoln as a whole (3.6/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q7
What is the demographic breakdown of Cosgroves?
Cosgroves has 5,375 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (57%), Hispanic / Latino (15.3%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (12.8%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.