Esmeralda County, Nevada Eviction Risk: Low
3 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Goldfield (3.9) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #15 of 17 NV counties
1k residents · 3 cities · 1 tracts
Esmeralda County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord24.8%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Esmeralda County, NV, tenants prevail in roughly 24.8% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline79dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Esmeralda County, NV until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 79 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$3.6–8.4klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Esmeralda County, NV costs landlords $3,553 to $8,401 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$1,04842% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Esmeralda County, NV is $1,048 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 42% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters23.5%of households23.5% of occupied housing units in Esmeralda County, NV are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty11.7%6.9% unemp.11.7% of Esmeralda County, NV residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 6.9%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Esmeralda County's 3.5/10 (Low) reflects Nevada's landlord-permissive NRS § 118A framework applied to a county with no rent control, no just-cause requirement, and a renter share of just 23.5%. Ranked 15th of 17 Nevada counties by eviction risk - 14 counties carry higher risk scores than Esmeralda.
How Esmeralda County ranks in Nevada
Landlord guides for Nevada
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Goldfield | 376 | 3.9 | 59.7% | $1,319 | Rep |
| 002 | Dyer | 277 | 3.1 | 28.3% | $843 | Rep |
| 003 | Silver Peak | 222 | 3.2 | 28.3% | $843 | Rep |
County heatmap
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Esmeralda County sits in the remote heart of the Nevada desert, covering roughly 3,589 square miles with a total population of just 875 residents. That scale - the third-smallest county population in the state - shapes everything about the local rental market. With only about 23.5% of households renting, landlords here deal with a thin tenant pool, limited comparable properties, and a court system that processes eviction matters out of the Sixth Judicial District in Minden eviction risk rather than a local courthouse. Despite those quirks, the county's eviction risk score lands at 3.5/10 (Low), placing it 15th of 17 Nevada eviction laws counties by risk - meaning 14 counties carry more landlord exposure than Esmeralda does.
The county's three incorporated communities differ in character and in risk profile. Goldfield, the county seat and largest community at 376 residents, scores 3.9/10 - the highest within the county and driven in part by its position as the administrative hub, where court filings and formal proceedings are more likely to occur. Silver Peak (population 222) comes in at 3.2/10, reflecting its mining-company-town dynamic and limited rental stock. Dyer, the smallest of the three at 277 residents, scores 3.1/10, the lowest in the county. Taken together, scores range from 3.1 to 3.9 across the county - a spread that, while modest in absolute terms, matters to landlords choosing between communities.
The broader economic picture adds context. Average asking rent in the county sits around $1,048 per month, but a rent burden of 41.8% - the share of renter income going to housing costs - signals that tenants here are financially stretched even at that price point. A poverty rate of 11.7% reinforces the picture of a population with limited financial cushion. Nevada's statewide legal framework under NRS § 118A applies uniformly here: landlords must serve a 7-day notice for nonpayment, a 5-day notice for lease violations with an opportunity to cure, and a 30-day no-cause notice at end of term. There is no local rent control ordinance - Nevada's preemption statute bars any municipality from enacting one - and no just-cause eviction requirement applies. The state mandates 24 hours' written notice before entry. Court filing fees run $270 to $360, with sheriff lockout costs between $75 and $200, and attorney fees for a contested matter typically ranging from $750 to $3,000.
Esmeralda County's Low risk designation reflects a combination of minimal tenant-protection overlays, a small and stable rental stock, and straightforward Nevada eviction laws procedural rules. With Nevada counties registering higher scores than Esmeralda's 3.5/10, landlords here operate in one of the state's more predictable regulatory environments - though the county's extreme remoteness and thin court infrastructure mean that even routine proceedings can take longer than the 21-to-45-day uncontested window suggests.
Historical eviction filings in Esmeralda County
From 2000 to 2016, eviction filings in Esmeralda County increased. The peak was 6 filings in 2010.1
- 12000
- 6Peak (2010)
- 12016
Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.
How Esmeralda County compares
Esmeralda County's 3.5/10 (Low) is below the Nevada statewide average of 4.4/10, placing it firmly in the lower-risk of the state's 17 counties. Neighboring Mineral County to the north and Pershing County to the northwest both register in the moderate-to-elevated range - considerably higher than Esmeralda's score. Eureka County to the northeast is among the very lowest-risk counties in Nevada eviction laws, and Lincoln County to the east also falls in the lower-risk band, making Esmeralda's position consistent with other rural Great Basin counties where tenant-protection statutes are sparse and local court capacity is limited.