Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally

Crystal Bay Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 32031990000 · Washoe, NV · pop 0 · 60% of tract blocks fall in Crystal Bay

Census tract 32031990000 in Crystal Bay, NV has no resident population in the ACS 5-year release. That usually means water, parkland, an airport, or industrial land rather than housing stock.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 45% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 0% Owners 100%
Tract context
SVI overall-10.00

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Crystal Bay
Moderate
Within county
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#92 of 139 tracts In Washoe
Low
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#562 of 779 tracts In Nevada
Low
National
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#63,308 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Crystal Bay and the region

Centroid at 39.2037, -119.9682 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crystal Bay scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Crystal Bay
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.2
State political climate
Nevada legislature & governorship
3.7
Economic stress
this tract poverty rate
3.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Crystal Bay
2.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Crystal Bay
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Crystal Bay
2.3

How Crystal Bay compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crystal Bay risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.23.2This tracttract 990000Crystal Bay: 3.23.2Crystal Bayparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: -1,000

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crystal Bay

It still carries a score of 3.2/10, but that figure is built entirely from the jurisdiction-level inputs it inherits from Crystal Bay: statute speed, court posture and rent-regulation exposure. There are no households here to measure.

There is no rental market to underwrite inside this boundary. For a real address, use an adjacent tract.

Frequently asked

About tract 32031990000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 32031990000?

Census tract 32031990000 in Crystal Bay scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

How socially vulnerable is tract 32031990000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the -1000th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic -1000th, household -1000th, minority -1000th, housing -1000th.
Q3

How does tract 32031990000 compare to Crystal Bay overall?

Tract 32031990000 scores 3.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Crystal Bay at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Crystal Bay; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related