Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Tract 33001965600 Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 33001965600 ·
Belknap County, NH · pop 3,960
33001965600 is a census tract in Belknap County, NH. It scores 3/10 for landlords. Severe burden reaches 34%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2%Stable renters 4%Owners 94%
Tract context
Occupied units1,698
Renter share6.2%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate6.9%
Median income$114,484
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
6th percentile
#17 of 18 tracts In Belknap County
Very Low
Within state
16th percentile
#294 of 349 tracts In New Hampshire
Very Low
National
20th percentile
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Belknap County and the region
Centroid at 43.4316, -71.3663 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 33001965600 scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
New Hampshire legislature & governorship
2.5
Economic stress
6.9% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,685 rent vs county FMR
6.4
Rent control risk
State baseline
2.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Tract 33001965600 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
7.0%Housing insecurity
4.8%Utility-shutoff threat
7.6%Food insecurity
5.4%SNAP enrollment
4.9%Transit barriers
5.3%No health insurance
14.6%Frequent mental distress
24.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tract 33001965600
The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.7/10. Cost burden runs 34% here against 41.2% across Belknap County.
Running cool, state political climate reads 2.5/10. On the softer side, local political climate reads 2.5/10.
SNAP participation runs 5.4% against 15.2% nationally. Against the Belknap County average of 4.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.0 points.
The voucher gap is 13.9%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Housing insecurity runs 7.0% against 14.2% nationally.
That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 6% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 33001965600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 33001965600?
Census tract 33001965600 in Belknap County scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 33001965600?
Median gross rent is $1,685/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 33001965600?
6.9% of residents in tract 33001965600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,960.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 33001965600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 14th, household 20th, minority 3th, housing 3th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 33001965600 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.