All Counties in New Hampshire, Eviction Risk 2026
10 counties covering 100 incorporated cities and 660,783 residents. Statewide average landlord risk score is 4.0/10 (Low), but county-level scores vary sharply, urban counties with strong tenant protections or high rent burdens routinely score several points above rural counties.
| County↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | Lean↕ | Renters↕ | % income on rent↕ | Avg rent↕ | Poverty↕ | Cities↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Cheshire County | 33,444 | 4.1 | Dem | 37.7% | 30.9% | $1,107 | 10.8% | 9 |
| 02 | Coos County | 17,631 | 4.0 | Rep | 35.2% | 28.9% | $951 | 12.9% | 7 |
| 03 | Grafton County | 43,976 | 4.0 | Dem | 39.5% | 29.7% | $1,247 | 13.4% | 15 |
| 04 | Rockingham County | 92,194 | 4.0 | IND | 31.6% | 32.8% | $1,612 | 5.6% | 11 |
| 05 | Strafford County | 93,783 | 4.0 | Dem | 40.0% | 33.5% | $1,371 | 9.4% | 8 |
| 06 | Merrimack County | 82,335 | 3.9 | Dem | 37.1% | 32.7% | $1,265 | 7.8% | 14 |
| 07 | Carroll County | 11,318 | 3.9 | IND | 24.6% | 33.6% | $1,243 | 11.3% | 9 |
| 08 | Hillsborough County | 245,724 | 3.9 | Dem | 30.2% | 29.7% | $1,388 | 6.9% | 18 |
| 09 | Belknap County | 21,663 | 3.9 | Rep | 26.7% | 31.6% | $968 | 13.6% | 5 |
| 10 | Sullivan County | 18,715 | 3.9 | IND | 39.7% | 33.3% | $1,301 | 16.2% | 4 |
Understanding county eviction risk in New Hampshire
New Hampshire's 10 counties span eviction-risk scores from 3.9 in Sullivan County to 4.1 in Cheshire County , a 0.2-point gap that captures how unevenly rent burdens, renter populations, and local tenant politics are distributed across the state. The statewide average sits at 4.0/10 (Low), but that single figure hides far more than it reveals, the table above scores every county on the same 1–10 scale so you can see exactly where landlord exposure concentrates.
The counties carrying the most eviction risk, Cheshire County, Coos County, Grafton County, are New Hampshire's denser, higher-cost markets. In Carroll County, renters spend an average of 34% of household income on rent, and 25% of its homes are renter-occupied, the cost pressure that pushes filings up and pulls tenant-protection ordinances into local politics. Larger metros also concentrate the legal-aid networks and renter-organizing capacity that lift a county's score above the rural baseline.
At the other end of the table, Sullivan County, Belknap County, Hillsborough County score lowest. These tend to be smaller, more rural counties where homeownership is the norm, rent-to-income ratios run lower, and local rent-control or just-cause ordinances are rare or state-preempted. Evictions still happen there, but the structural pressure that drives a high score (heavy rent burden, a large renter majority, organized tenant advocacy) is simply weaker.
Each county score is a population-weighted aggregate of every city scored inside it, so a county with one expensive urban core and a dozen quiet suburbs lands somewhere in between. Click any county row to drill into its cities ranked one by one, a zoomed heat map, and a full breakdown of rent burden, renter share, poverty rate, and political margin. For the statutes that apply statewide regardless of county, notice periods, security-deposit caps, just-cause and rent-control rules, see the New Hampshire state overview.