Lancaster Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Margate City
Tract 34001013102 · Atlantic County, NJ · pop 1,173 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
How risky is the Lancaster Park area of Margate City for landlords? Census tract 34001013102 scores 6.5/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than roughly 87% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
42% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 11% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,441 a month against an average household income of $104,146 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 15% of occupied homes.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Margate City and the region
Centroid at 39.3199, -74.5122 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lancaster Park scores 4.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Lancaster Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 10
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 17%Socioeconomic
- 6%Household composition
- 13%Racial/ethnic minority
- 30%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 5%Grade A
- 23%Grade B
- 52%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 88Total filings over 6 yrs
- 3.48%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.6%Peak (2013)
- 15Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lancaster Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.5%Housing insecurity
- 4.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.7%Food insecurity
- 4.8%SNAP enrollment
- 4.8%Transit barriers
- 6.2%No health insurance
- 13.0%Frequent mental distress
- 25.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Lancaster Park
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 6.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Margate City, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Atlantic County average of 6.7 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 10th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 88 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 3.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.6% of renter households in 2013.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 34001013102
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34001013102?
What is the average rent in tract 34001013102?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34001013102?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34001013102?
Is tract 34001013102 considered part of Lancaster Park?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34001013102?
What share of households in tract 34001013102 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34001013102 compare to Margate City overall?
Was tract 34001013102 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Margate City
Top eight tracts in Margate City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.