Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally
Lancaster Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Margate City
Tract 34001013102 · Atlantic County, NJ · pop 1,173 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
34001013102 is a census tract in the Lancaster Park area of Margate City, NJ. It scores 3.8/10 for landlords. It is home to 1,173 residents. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.3/10.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 9%
Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units774
Renter share15.2%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate13.3%
Median income$104,146
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
26
th percentile
Low
Within state
14
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Margate City and the region
Centroid at 39.3199, -74.5122 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lancaster Park scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Margate City
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
13.3% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$1,441 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Margate City
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Margate City
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Margate City
5.3
How Lancaster Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 10
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 17%Socioeconomic
- 6%Household composition
- 13%Racial/ethnic minority
- 30%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 5%Grade A
- 23%Grade B
- 52%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 88Total filings over 6 yrs
- 3.48%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.6%Peak (2013)
- 15Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 17% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Lancaster Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.5%Housing insecurity
- 4.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.7%Food insecurity
- 4.8%SNAP enrollment
- 4.8%Transit barriers
- 6.2%No health insurance
- 13.0%Frequent mental distress
- 25.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lancaster Park
It sits 1.7 points below the Atlantic County average of 5.5. Against Atlantic County at 48.9%, 42% of renters here are cost-burdened.
SNAP participation runs 4.8% against 15.2% nationally. Severe burden reaches 11%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
The filing record is not thin: 88 evictions over 6 years of observation. Housing insecurity runs 6.5% against 14.2% nationally. The worst year on record was 2013, when 3.6% of renter households were served.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Atlantic City. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 3.5% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 38% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 15% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 34001013102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34001013102?
Census tract 34001013102 in the Lancaster Park neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34001013102?
Median gross rent is $1,441/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34001013102?
13.3% of residents in tract 34001013102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,173.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34001013102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 6th, minority 13th, housing 30th.
Q5
Is tract 34001013102 considered part of Lancaster Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34001013102 fall within Lancaster Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34001013102?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 88 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34001013102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.48% of renter households, peaking at 3.6% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34001013102 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34001013102 compare to Margate City overall?
Tract 34001013102 scores 3.8/10, lower than the parent city of Margate City at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Margate City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34001013102 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Margate City
Top eight tracts in Margate City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related