Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally

Lancaster Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Margate City

Tract 34001013102 · Atlantic County, NJ · pop 1,173 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

How risky is the Lancaster Park area of Margate City for landlords? Census tract 34001013102 scores 6.5/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than roughly 87% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

42% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 11% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,441 a month against an average household income of $104,146 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 15% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 9% Owners 85%
Tract context
Occupied units774
Renter share15.2%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate13.3%
Median income$104,146

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Lancaster Park
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Margate City
Very High
Within county
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#41 of 73 tracts In Atlantic County
Moderate
Within state
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#870 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Margate City and the region

Centroid at 39.3199, -74.5122 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lancaster Park scores 4.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Margate City
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
13.3% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$1,441 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Margate City
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Margate City
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Margate City
5.3

How Lancaster Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lancaster Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.34.3This tracttract 013102Margate City: 7.17.1Margate Cityparent cityCounty: 5.05.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 88Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 3.48%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.6%Peak (2013)
  • 15Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 340010131022013: 18 filings (3.64/100 renter HHs)2014: 17 filings (3.43/100 renter HHs)2015: 14 filings (2.83/100 renter HHs)2016: 15 filings (4.21/100 renter HHs)2017: 9 filings (2.53/100 renter HHs)2018: 15 filings (4.21/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 17% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lancaster Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lancaster Park

The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 6.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Margate City, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Atlantic County average of 6.7 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 10th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 88 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 3.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.6% of renter households in 2013.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 34001013102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34001013102?

Census tract 34001013102 in the Lancaster Park neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34001013102?

Median gross rent is $1,441/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34001013102?

13.3% of residents in tract 34001013102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,173.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34001013102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 6th, minority 13th, housing 30th.
Q5

Is tract 34001013102 considered part of Lancaster Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34001013102 fall within Lancaster Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34001013102?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 88 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34001013102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.48% of renter households, peaking at 3.6% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 34001013102 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 34001013102 compare to Margate City overall?

Tract 34001013102 scores 4.3/10, lower than the parent city of Margate City at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Margate City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 34001013102 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Margate City

Top eight tracts in Margate City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related