Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #20,506 of 84,120 nationally

Tenafly Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 34003055202 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 4,347

Tract 34003055202 sits in Tenafly, NJ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.8/10. It is home to 4,347 residents. The dominant input is supply constraint at 10/10.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 19% Owners 66%
Tract context
Occupied units1,454
Renter share33.9%
SVI overall0.44
Poverty rate4.8%
Median income$185,595

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Tenafly
Very High
Within county
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#110 of 203 tracts In Bergen County
Moderate
Within state
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#1,034 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Moderate
National
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#20,506 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tenafly and the region

Centroid at 40.9294, -73.9725 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tenafly scores 5.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tenafly
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.8% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$3,385 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tenafly
3.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tenafly
6.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tenafly
3.2

How Tenafly compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tenafly risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.8This tracttract 0552026.5Tenaflyparent city6.3Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 44

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tenafly

The voucher gap is 63.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Severe burden reaches 25%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.2/10.

Disability prevalence runs 16.6% against 31.5% nationally. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 7.9/10. Food insecurity runs 7.4% against 17.8% nationally.

This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Bergen Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #20,506 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.9/10.

Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. 43% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the Bergen County average of 6.3 closely.

Average gross rent is $3,385, close to the Tenafly average. Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $185,595. 34% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 34003055202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003055202?

Census tract 34003055202 in Tenafly scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34003055202?

Median gross rent is $3,385/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34003055202?

4.8% of residents in tract 34003055202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,347.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34003055202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 44th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 59th, minority 69th, housing 34th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 34003055202 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 34003055202 compare to Tenafly overall?

Tract 34003055202 scores 5.8/10, lower than the parent city of Tenafly at 6.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tenafly; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 34003055202 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tenafly

Top eight tracts in Tenafly ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related