Census Tract · Ranked #13,812 of 84,120 nationally
Tract 34003031200 Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 34003031200 ·
Bergen County, NJ · pop 4,649
Tract 34003031200 sits in Bergen County, NJ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.8/10. It is home to 4,649 residents. Severe burden reaches 29%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
6.8
Elevated
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%Stable renters 18%Owners 63%
Tract context
Occupied units2,019
Renter share36.7%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate9.6%
Median income$95,799
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
64th percentile
#73 of 203 tracts In Bergen County
Elevated
Within state
68th percentile
#703 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Elevated
National
84th percentile
#13,812 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Bergen County and the region
Centroid at 40.8165, -74.1256 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 34003031200 scores 6.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
9.6% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,338 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
State baseline
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Tract 34003031200 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 64
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
56%Socioeconomic
39%Household composition
55%Racial/ethnic minority
81%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
80%Grade C
2%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
12.1%Housing insecurity
6.5%Utility-shutoff threat
13.5%Food insecurity
7.7%SNAP enrollment
7.0%Transit barriers
12.5%No health insurance
15.6%Frequent mental distress
24.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tract 34003031200
Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 1.5/10. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 7.9/10.
Running cool, economic stress reads 2.4/10. The filing record is not thin: 141 evictions over 5 years of observation.
roughly one in two of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Bergen County average of 46.6%. SNAP participation runs 7.7% against 15.2% nationally.
The worst year on record was 2013, when 3.8% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 3.0% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 84% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.8/10.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 34003031200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003031200?
Census tract 34003031200 in Bergen County scores 6.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34003031200?
Median gross rent is $1,338/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34003031200?
9.6% of residents in tract 34003031200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,649.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34003031200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 39th, minority 55th, housing 81th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34003031200?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 141 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 34003031200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.00% of renter households, peaking at 3.8% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 34003031200 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
Was tract 34003031200 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 2% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.