Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,622 of 84,120 nationally
Cramer Hill Eviction Risk: High , Camden
Tract 34007600900 · Camden County, NJ · pop 3,804 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
Census tract 34007600900 covers part of the Cramer Hill area of Camden, NJ, and scores 8.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,804. Against the Camden County average of 5.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 3.1 points.
Risk score
8.8
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38%
Stable renters 36%
Owners 26%
Tract context
Occupied units1,228
Renter share73.1%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate31.7%
Median income$32,813
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
89
th percentile
High
Within state
90
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Camden and the region
Centroid at 39.9533, -75.1016 · click any tract to drill in
Why Cramer Hill scores 8.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Camden
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
31.7% poverty · this tract
7.9
Supply constraint
$984 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camden
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camden
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camden
7.0
How Cramer Hill compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 99
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 95%Socioeconomic
- 100%Household composition
- 99%Racial/ethnic minority
- 85%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 22%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 731Total filings over 6 yrs
- 12.02%Avg annual filing rate
- 15.1%Peak (2013)
- 143Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 6 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 44.2%Housing insecurity
- 28.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 58.4%Food insecurity
- 49.2%SNAP enrollment
- 28.4%Transit barriers
- 41.6%No health insurance
- 23.4%Frequent mental distress
- 47.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Cramer Hill
Food insecurity runs 58.4% against 17.8% nationally. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10. Set annual rent against average income of $32,813 and the ratio lands at 36%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. 22% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
This is renter territory: 73% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. The poverty rate is 32%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
Disability prevalence runs 47.6% against 31.5% nationally. Sitting well above the midpoint, economic stress reads 7.9/10. At $984 a month, rents run 20% under what the rest of Camden commands.
Court records carry 731 eviction filings across 6 observed years.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007600900
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007600900?
Census tract 34007600900 in the Cramer Hill neighborhood scores 8.8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007600900?
Median gross rent is $984/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007600900?
31.7% of residents in tract 34007600900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,804.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007600900?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 95th, household 100th, minority 99th, housing 85th.
Q5
Is tract 34007600900 considered part of Cramer Hill?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34007600900 fall within Cramer Hill (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007600900?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 731 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007600900 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 12.02% of renter households, peaking at 15.1% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34007600900 struggle to pay rent?
About 44.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 28.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34007600900 compare to Camden overall?
Tract 34007600900 scores 8.8/10, higher than the parent city of Camden at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camden eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34007600900 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Camden
Top eight tracts in Camden ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related