Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #28,095 of 84,120 nationally

Collingswood Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 34007604300 · Camden County, NJ · pop 3,927

Tract 34007604300 sits in Collingswood, NJ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.3/10. Population here is 3,927. 29% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Camden County average of 48.5%.

Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 26% Owners 63%
Tract context
Occupied units1,821
Renter share36.9%
SVI overall0.02
Poverty rate8.4%
Median income$118,661

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Collingswood
Low
Within county
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#70 of 129 tracts In Camden County
Moderate
Within state
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#1,234 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Moderate
National
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#28,095 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Collingswood and the region

Centroid at 39.9178, -75.0651 · click any tract to drill in

Why Collingswood scores 5.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Collingswood
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.4% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$1,435 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Collingswood
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Collingswood
8.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Collingswood
6.4

How Collingswood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Collingswood risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.3This tracttract 6043006.4Collingswoodparent city5.7Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 2

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 59Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 1.76%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.8%Peak (2016)
  • 5Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 34007604300
Filings dropped 62% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Collingswood

What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.4/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.8/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2.1/10.

SNAP participation runs 4.5% against 15.2% nationally. 12% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Food insecurity runs 7.6% against 17.8% nationally. Court records carry 59 eviction filings across 6 observed years. Filings peaked in 2016 at 2.8% of renter households.

This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Camden. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 1.8% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 67% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.2/10. Against average income of $118,661, annual rent is just 15%.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 34007604300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007604300?

Census tract 34007604300 in Collingswood scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34007604300?

Median gross rent is $1,435/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 29% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34007604300?

8.4% of residents in tract 34007604300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,927.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34007604300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 4th, minority 15th, housing 12th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007604300?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 59 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007604300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.76% of renter households, peaking at 2.8% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 34007604300 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 34007604300 compare to Collingswood overall?

Tract 34007604300 scores 5.3/10, lower than the parent city of Collingswood at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Collingswood; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 34007604300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Collingswood

Top eight tracts in Collingswood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related