Golden Triangle Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 34007603700 · Camden County, NJ · pop 3,649 · 3% of tract blocks fall in Golden Triangle
Tract 34007603700 covers Golden Triangle in Camden County in New Jersey. Home to 3,649 residents, it scores 6.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 92% of US census tracts.
About 54% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,397 monthly, set against $80,733 in average yearly household income, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 36% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Golden Triangle and the region
Centroid at 39.9102, -75.0165 · click any tract to drill in
Why Golden Triangle scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Golden Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 56
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 55%Socioeconomic
- 56%Household composition
- 54%Racial/ethnic minority
- 50%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 23%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 542Total filings over 6 yrs
- 16.81%Avg annual filing rate
- 18.7%Peak (2014)
- 75Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.7%Housing insecurity
- 6.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.7%Food insecurity
- 6.9%SNAP enrollment
- 6.5%Transit barriers
- 9.4%No health insurance
- 15.3%Frequent mental distress
- 23.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Golden Triangle
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 7.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Golden Triangle, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Camden County average of 6.8 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 56th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 542 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 16.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 18.7% of renter households in 2014.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 34007603700
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007603700?
What is the average rent in tract 34007603700?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007603700?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007603700?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007603700?
What share of households in tract 34007603700 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34007603700 compare to Golden Triangle overall?
Was tract 34007603700 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Golden Triangle
Top eight tracts in Golden Triangle ranked by composite eviction-risk score.