Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #24,859 of 84,120 nationally
Golden Triangle Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 34007603202 · Camden County, NJ · pop 2,608 · 95% of tract blocks fall in Golden Triangle
Tract 34007603202 sits in Golden Triangle, NJ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.4/10. Population here is 2,608. Against Camden County at 48.5%, around a third of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15%
Stable renters 32%
Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,389
Renter share47.3%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate10.0%
Median income$111,563
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
49
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
45
th percentile
Moderate
National
70
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Golden Triangle and the region
Centroid at 39.9284, -75.0446 · click any tract to drill in
Why Golden Triangle scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Golden Triangle
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
10.0% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$2,488 rent vs county FMR
8.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Golden Triangle
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Golden Triangle
7.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Golden Triangle
5.0
How Golden Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 31
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 21%Socioeconomic
- 57%Household composition
- 40%Racial/ethnic minority
- 34%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 14%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.1%Housing insecurity
- 6.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.7%Food insecurity
- 7.2%SNAP enrollment
- 6.3%Transit barriers
- 8.3%No health insurance
- 14.2%Frequent mental distress
- 25.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Golden Triangle
The voucher gap is 38.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.4/10. On the high side, supply constraint reads 8.8/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.9/10. The severe-burden share is 12%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
SNAP participation runs 7.2% against 15.2% nationally. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Camden. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 70% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.7/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
It tracks the Camden County average of 5.7 closely.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007603202
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007603202?
Census tract 34007603202 in Golden Triangle scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007603202?
Median gross rent is $2,488/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007603202?
10.0% of residents in tract 34007603202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,608.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007603202?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 57th, minority 40th, housing 34th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 34007603202 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 34007603202 compare to Golden Triangle overall?
Tract 34007603202 scores 5.4/10, lower than the parent city of Golden Triangle at 6.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Golden Triangle; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7
Was tract 34007603202 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Golden Triangle
Top eight tracts in Golden Triangle ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related