Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #10,727 of 84,120 nationally
Lawnside Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 34007606500 · Camden County, NJ · pop 3,059
With a score of 7.4/10, tract 34007606500 in Lawnside, NJ reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Severe burden reaches 33%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
7.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 14%
Stable renters 19%
Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units1,196
Renter share33.0%
SVI overall0.78
Poverty rate19.6%
Median income$70,338
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
81
th percentile
High
Within state
75
th percentile
High
National
87
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Lawnside and the region
Centroid at 39.8673, -75.0289 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lawnside scores 7.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Lawnside
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
19.6% poverty · this tract
4.9
Supply constraint
$1,034 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lawnside
4.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lawnside
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lawnside
6.4
How Lawnside compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 78
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 66%Socioeconomic
- 71%Household composition
- 95%Racial/ethnic minority
- 74%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 1%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 221Total filings over 6 yrs
- 11.60%Avg annual filing rate
- 11.1%Peak (2018)
- 49Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 23.1%Housing insecurity
- 15.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 28.4%Food insecurity
- 22.5%SNAP enrollment
- 13.7%Transit barriers
- 12.6%No health insurance
- 17.2%Frequent mental distress
- 35.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lawnside
What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.4/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10.
It sits 1.7 points above the Camden County average of 5.7. Cost burden runs 42% here against 48.5% across Camden County.
The poverty rate is 20%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Housing insecurity runs 23.1% against 14.2% nationally.
Court records carry 221 eviction filings across 6 observed years. On the high side, local political climate reads 7/10.
SNAP participation runs 22.5% against 15.2% nationally. Filings peaked in 2018 at 11.1% of renter households.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 11.6% of renter households face a filing.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007606500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007606500?
Census tract 34007606500 in Lawnside scores 7.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007606500?
Median gross rent is $1,034/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007606500?
19.6% of residents in tract 34007606500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,059.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007606500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 78th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 66th, household 71th, minority 95th, housing 74th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007606500?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 221 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007606500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.60% of renter households, peaking at 11.1% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 34007606500 struggle to pay rent?
About 23.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 34007606500 compare to Lawnside overall?
Tract 34007606500 scores 7.4/10, higher than the parent city of Lawnside at 6.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lawnside; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 34007606500 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related