Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #65,414 of 84,120 nationally

Country Walk Eviction Risk: Lower , Springdale

Tract 34007603507 · Camden County, NJ · pop 7,552 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

34007603507 is a census tract in the Country Walk area of Springdale, NJ. It scores 3.1/10 for landlords. Population here is 7,552. The severe-burden share is 34%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 9% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units2,962
Renter share21.4%
SVI overall0.57
Poverty rate8.6%
Median income$156,250

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Country Walk
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Springdale
Very Low
Within county
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#123 of 129 tracts In Camden County
Very Low
Within state
4 th percentile
Rank, 4th percentileLowHigh
#2,096 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Springdale and the region

Centroid at 39.8744, -74.9568 · click any tract to drill in

Why Country Walk scores 3.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Springdale
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
8.6% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$836 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Springdale
7.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Springdale
3.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Springdale
5.7

How Country Walk compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Country Walk risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.1This tracttract 6035074.5Springdaleparent city5.7Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 57

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 55Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 1.86%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.8%Peak (2013)
  • 4Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 34007603507
Filings dropped 69% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Country Walk. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Country Walk

Against the Camden County average of 5.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.6 points. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.4/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10.

56% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Camden County average of 48.5%. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2.2/10. Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 55 filings here across 6 tracked years.

Housing insecurity runs 6.5% against 14.2% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

Filings peaked in 2013 at 2.8% of renter households. In a typical year about 1.9% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 22nd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

At 21% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 6.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Rent consumes only 6% of average household income of $156,250, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 34007603507

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007603507?

Census tract 34007603507 in the Country Walk neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34007603507?

Median gross rent is $836/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34007603507?

8.6% of residents in tract 34007603507 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,552.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34007603507?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 57th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 32th, household 69th, minority 37th, housing 81th.
Q5

Is tract 34007603507 considered part of Country Walk?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34007603507 fall within Country Walk (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007603507?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 55 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007603507 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.86% of renter households, peaking at 2.8% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 34007603507 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 34007603507 compare to Springdale overall?

Tract 34007603507 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of Springdale at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Springdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Springdale

Top eight tracts in Springdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related