Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #78,212 of 84,120 nationally

Crestview Eviction Risk: Lower , Seaville

Tract 34009020302 · Cape May County, NJ · pop 4,803 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

The Crestview neighborhood of Seaville anchors census tract 34009020302, which lands at 4.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 35% of US census tracts.

About 17% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,862 a month against an average household income of $109,712 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 4% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 3% Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units1,901
Renter share3.7%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$109,712

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Crestview
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Seaville
Moderate
Within county
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#30 of 32 tracts In Cape May County
Very Low
Within state
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#1,954 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Seaville and the region

Centroid at 39.2259, -74.6832 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crestview scores 1.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Seaville
4.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.2
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,862 rent vs county FMR
6.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Seaville
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Seaville
2.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Seaville
3.2

How Crestview compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crestview risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.61.6This tracttract 020302Seaville: 6.46.4Seavilleparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 6

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 36Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 8.00%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.9%Peak (2018)
  • 13Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 340090203022013: 8 filings (4.26/100 renter HHs)2016: 3 filings (2.97/100 renter HHs)2017: 12 filings (11.88/100 renter HHs)2018: 13 filings (12.87/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 63% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crestview

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 6.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Seaville, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Cape May County average of 6.0 and below the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 36 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 8.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 12.9% of renter households in 2018.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 34009020302

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34009020302?

Census tract 34009020302 in the Crestview neighborhood scores 1.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34009020302?

Median gross rent is $1,862/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 17% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34009020302?

2.6% of residents in tract 34009020302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,803.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34009020302?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 15th, minority 9th, housing 34th.
Q5

Is tract 34009020302 considered part of Crestview?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34009020302 fall within Crestview (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34009020302?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 36 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 34009020302 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.00% of renter households, peaking at 12.9% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 34009020302 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 34009020302 compare to Seaville overall?

Tract 34009020302 scores 1.6/10, lower than the parent city of Seaville at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Seaville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related