Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally
National Park Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 34015500300 · Gloucester County, NJ · pop 3,028
For landlords sizing up National Park, census tract 34015500300 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of 6.8/10. That is riskier than about 92% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 68% of renter households, a severe level, and 41% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,380 monthly, set against $81,507 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 16% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%
Stable renters 5%
Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,079
Renter share16.0%
SVI overall0.34
Poverty rate7.7%
Median income$81,507
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
72
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
51
th percentile
Moderate
National
45
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across National Park and the region
Centroid at 39.8673, -75.1856 · click any tract to drill in
Why National Park scores 3.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from National Park
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.1
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.7% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$1,380 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from National Park
9.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from National Park
3.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from National Park
6.9
How National Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 34
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 60%Socioeconomic
- 42%Household composition
- 19%Racial/ethnic minority
- 15%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 179Total filings over 6 yrs
- 13.64%Avg annual filing rate
- 23.6%Peak (2014)
- 21Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 28% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.5%Housing insecurity
- 7.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 14.2%Food insecurity
- 9.2%SNAP enrollment
- 7.7%Transit barriers
- 9.3%No health insurance
- 18.8%Frequent mental distress
- 29.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in National Park
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 9.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from National Park, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Gloucester County average of 6.3 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 12.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 179 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 13.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 23.6% of renter households in 2014.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 34015500300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34015500300?
Census tract 34015500300 in National Park scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34015500300?
Median gross rent is $1,380/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 68% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34015500300?
7.7% of residents in tract 34015500300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,028.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34015500300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 34th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 60th, household 42th, minority 19th, housing 15th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34015500300?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 179 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34015500300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 13.64% of renter households, peaking at 23.6% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 34015500300 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 34015500300 compare to National Park overall?
Tract 34015500300 scores 3.7/10, lower than the parent city of National Park at 7.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from National Park; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related