Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Loveladies Eviction Risk: Lower , Barnegat Light

Tract 34029738100 · Ocean County, NJ · pop 1,613 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

34029738100 is a census tract in the Loveladies area of Barnegat Light, NJ. It scores 3/10 for landlords. Severe burden reaches 29%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 2% Owners 97%
Tract context
Occupied units776
Renter share3.6%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate4.5%
Median income$136,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Loveladies
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Barnegat Light
Moderate
Within county
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#141 of 144 tracts In Ocean County
Very Low
Within state
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#2,115 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Barnegat Light and the region

Centroid at 39.7315, -74.1271 · click any tract to drill in

Why Loveladies scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Barnegat Light
4.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.5% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$1,359 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Barnegat Light
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Barnegat Light
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Barnegat Light
4.6

How Loveladies compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Loveladies risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 738100Barnegat Light: 4.34.3Barnegat Lightparent cityCounty: 5.05.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 6.06.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 13

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 7Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 4.64%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.9%Peak (2014)
  • 2Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 340297381002013: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2014: 3 filings (5.88/100 renter HHs)2015: 1 filings (1.96/100 renter HHs)2016: 1 filings (3.57/100 renter HHs)2017: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2018: 2 filings (7.14/100 renter HHs)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Loveladies

The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.1/10. Against the Ocean County average of 5.0, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.0 points.

39% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Ocean County average of 50.5%. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.7/10.

Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.7/10. Housing insecurity runs 3.9% against 14.2% nationally. The filing record is not thin: 7 evictions over 4 years of observation.

Adults with no health insurance runs 4.3% against 11.3% nationally. The worst year on record was 2014, when 5.9% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 4.6% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 4% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 34029738100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34029738100?

Census tract 34029738100 in the Loveladies neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34029738100?

Median gross rent is $1,359/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34029738100?

4.5% of residents in tract 34029738100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,613.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34029738100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 30th, household 7th, minority 15th, housing 24th.
Q5

Is tract 34029738100 considered part of Loveladies?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34029738100 fall within Loveladies (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34029738100?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 7 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 34029738100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.64% of renter households, peaking at 5.9% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 34029738100 struggle to pay rent?

About 3.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 34029738100 compare to Barnegat Light overall?

Tract 34029738100 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Barnegat Light at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Barnegat Light; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related