Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,017 of 84,120 nationally

Chelwood Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Albuquerque

Tract 35001000129 · Bernalillo County, NM · pop 4,774 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 35001000129 sits in the Chelwood Park neighborhood of Albuquerque eviction risk, New Mexico eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.8/10. That is riskier than about 68% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 34% of renter households, a high level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $878 a month against an average household income of $55,119 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 65% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 43% Owners 35%
Tract context
Occupied units2,329
Renter share64.7%
SVI overall0.66
Poverty rate16.5%
Median income$55,119

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Chelwood Park
Very High
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#50 of 149 tracts In Albuquerque
Elevated
Within county
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#59 of 176 tracts In Bernalillo County
Elevated
Within state
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#279 of 612 tracts In New Mexico
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Albuquerque and the region

Centroid at 35.0902, -106.5059 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chelwood Park scores 4.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Albuquerque
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
New Mexico legislature & governorship
3.9
Economic stress
16.5% poverty · this tract
4.1
Supply constraint
$878 rent vs county FMR
1.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Albuquerque
4.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Albuquerque
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Albuquerque
5.0

How Chelwood Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chelwood Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.84.8This tracttract 000129Albuquerque: 4.24.2Albuquerqueparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.64.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 66

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,100Total filings over 15 yrs
  • 9.55%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.0%Peak (2009)
  • 107Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 350010001292000: 126 filings (8.57/100 renter HHs)2001: 121 filings (8.23/100 renter HHs)2002: 100 filings (6.80/100 renter HHs)2003: 114 filings (7.75/100 renter HHs)2004: 134 filings (9.11/100 renter HHs)2005: 101 filings (7.27/100 renter HHs)2006: 132 filings (9.50/100 renter HHs)2007: 155 filings (11.16/100 renter HHs)2008: 175 filings (12.60/100 renter HHs)2009: 181 filings (13.03/100 renter HHs)2010: 153 filings (9.80/100 renter HHs)2011: 156 filings (10.12/100 renter HHs)2012: 165 filings (10.71/100 renter HHs)2013: 180 filings (11.68/100 renter HHs)2014: 107 filings (6.94/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 15% over the past 15 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,047Total filings 2020-21
  • 13.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 16.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.85×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 23 filings (1.35× baseline)2020-02-01: 23 filings (1.57× baseline)2020-03-01: 18 filings (1.69× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.06× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 7 filings (0.30× baseline)2020-08-01: 8 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-09-01: 18 filings (0.76× baseline)2020-10-01: 12 filings (0.58× baseline)2020-11-01: 10 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-12-01: 26 filings (1.59× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-02-01: 10 filings (0.68× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (0.47× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (0.23× baseline)2021-05-01: 5 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.12× baseline)2021-07-01: 13 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (0.16× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.08× baseline)2021-10-01: 10 filings (0.48× baseline)2021-11-01: 7 filings (0.53× baseline)2021-12-01: 9 filings (0.55× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (0.18× baseline)2022-02-01: 13 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-03-01: 16 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (0.31× baseline)2022-05-01: 10 filings (0.58× baseline)2022-06-01: 21 filings (1.26× baseline)2022-07-01: 17 filings (0.74× baseline)2022-08-01: 9 filings (0.47× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (0.25× baseline)2022-10-01: 9 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-11-01: 14 filings (1.05× baseline)2022-12-01: 17 filings (1.04× baseline)2023-01-01: 22 filings (1.29× baseline)2023-02-01: 8 filings (0.55× baseline)2023-03-01: 16 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-04-01: 21 filings (1.62× baseline)2023-05-01: 12 filings (0.69× baseline)2023-06-01: 25 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-07-01: 31 filings (1.35× baseline)2023-08-01: 27 filings (1.42× baseline)2023-09-01: 21 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-10-01: 24 filings (1.16× baseline)2023-11-01: 25 filings (1.88× baseline)2023-12-01: 17 filings (1.04× baseline)2024-01-01: 28 filings (1.65× baseline)2024-02-01: 14 filings (0.95× baseline)2024-03-01: 9 filings (0.84× baseline)2024-04-01: 22 filings (1.69× baseline)2024-05-01: 18 filings (1.04× baseline)2024-06-01: 16 filings (0.96× baseline)2024-07-01: 10 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-08-01: 15 filings (0.79× baseline)2024-09-01: 15 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-10-01: 21 filings (1.02× baseline)2024-11-01: 14 filings (1.05× baseline)2024-12-01: 12 filings (0.73× baseline)2025-01-01: 12 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-02-01: 15 filings (1.02× baseline)2025-03-01: 7 filings (0.66× baseline)2025-04-01: 14 filings (1.08× baseline)2025-05-01: 24 filings (1.38× baseline)2025-06-01: 5 filings (0.30× baseline)2025-07-01: 11 filings (0.48× baseline)2025-08-01: 19 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 27 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-10-01: 12 filings (0.58× baseline)2025-11-01: 8 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-12-01: 18 filings (1.10× baseline)2026-01-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 21 filings (210.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Albuquerque, NM as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Chelwood Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chelwood Park

The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Albuquerque eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Bernalillo County average of 6.1 and above the New Mexico statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 66th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 14.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 10.1% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 35001000129

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 35001000129?

Census tract 35001000129 in the Chelwood Park neighborhood scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 35001000129?

Median gross rent is $878/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 35001000129?

16.5% of residents in tract 35001000129 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,774.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 35001000129?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 66th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 65th, household 78th, minority 77th, housing 38th.
Q5

Is tract 35001000129 considered part of Chelwood Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 35001000129 fall within Chelwood Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 35001000129?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,100 eviction filings across 15 validated years in tract 35001000129 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.55% of renter households, peaking at 13.0% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 35001000129 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.85× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Albuquerque eviction risk, NM), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 35001000129 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 35001000129 compare to Albuquerque overall?

Tract 35001000129 scores 4.8/10, higher than the parent city of Albuquerque at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Albuquerque eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Albuquerque

Top eight tracts in Albuquerque ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related