Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally

Scarsdale Park Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 36119010100 · Westchester County, NY · pop 4,811 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Tract 36119010100 sits in the Scarsdale Park area of Scarsdale, NY, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.2/10. Population here is 4,811. Against the Westchester County average of 7.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.6 points.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 6% Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units1,466
Renter share13.0%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate0.8%
Median income$250,001

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Scarsdale Park
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Scarsdale
Very Low
Within county
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#228 of 241 tracts In Westchester County
Very Low
Within state
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#4,717 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Scarsdale and the region

Centroid at 40.9827, -73.7984 · click any tract to drill in

Why Scarsdale Park scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Scarsdale
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.8
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
0.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
7.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Scarsdale
2.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Scarsdale
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Scarsdale
2.2

How Scarsdale Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Scarsdale Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.25.2This tracttract 010100Scarsdale: 6.46.4Scarsdaleparent cityCounty: 7.87.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.77.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Scarsdale Park

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. The severe-burden share is 20%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The voucher gap is 25.9%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 2.2/10. SNAP participation runs 2.8% against 15.2% nationally. On the softer side, housing-court posture reads 2.2/10.

54% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Westchester County average of 47.2%. Adults with no health insurance runs 2.6% against 11.3% nationally. This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lower Westchester Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

On the national scale it lands near the 65th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 13% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3/10.

Against average income of $250,001, annual rent is just 17%.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 36119010100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36119010100?

Census tract 36119010100 in the Scarsdale Park neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36119010100?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36119010100?

0.8% of residents in tract 36119010100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,811.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36119010100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 64th, minority 51th, housing 35th.
Q5

Is tract 36119010100 considered part of Scarsdale Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36119010100 fall within Scarsdale Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36119010100 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36119010100 compare to Scarsdale overall?

Tract 36119010100 scores 5.2/10, lower than the parent city of Scarsdale at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Scarsdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36119010100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Scarsdale

Top eight tracts in Scarsdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related