Scarsdale Park Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 36119010100 · Westchester County, NY · pop 4,811 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Tract 36119010100 sits in the Scarsdale Park area of Scarsdale, NY, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.2/10. Population here is 4,811. Against the Westchester County average of 7.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.6 points.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Scarsdale and the region
Centroid at 40.9827, -73.7984 · click any tract to drill in
Why Scarsdale Park scores 5.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Scarsdale Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 23
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 5%Socioeconomic
- 64%Household composition
- 51%Racial/ethnic minority
- 35%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 1%Grade A
- 1%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.8%Housing insecurity
- 2.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.6%Food insecurity
- 2.8%SNAP enrollment
- 3.1%Transit barriers
- 2.6%No health insurance
- 10.0%Frequent mental distress
- 14.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Scarsdale Park
Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. The severe-burden share is 20%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The voucher gap is 25.9%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 2.2/10. SNAP participation runs 2.8% against 15.2% nationally. On the softer side, housing-court posture reads 2.2/10.
54% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Westchester County average of 47.2%. Adults with no health insurance runs 2.6% against 11.3% nationally. This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lower Westchester Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
On the national scale it lands near the 65th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 13% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3/10.
Against average income of $250,001, annual rent is just 17%.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 36119010100
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36119010100?
What is the average rent in tract 36119010100?
What is the poverty rate in tract 36119010100?
How socially vulnerable is tract 36119010100?
Is tract 36119010100 considered part of Scarsdale Park?
What share of households in tract 36119010100 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 36119010100 compare to Scarsdale overall?
Was tract 36119010100 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Scarsdale
Top eight tracts in Scarsdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.