Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally

Catawba Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 37035011501 · Catawba County, NC · pop 4,737 · 29% of tract blocks fall in Catawba

Here is how census tract 37035011501, in Catawba in Catawba County, looks to a landlord: a 5.7/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 4,737. It lands near the 64th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 56% of renter households, a severe level, and 1% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $70,074 a year. Renters make up 14% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 6% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units2,482
Renter share14.3%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate10.9%
Median income$70,074

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Catawba
Moderate
Within county
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#19 of 34 tracts In Catawba County
Moderate
Within state
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1,333 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Moderate
National
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#46,312 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Catawba and the region

Centroid at 35.6380, -81.0599 · click any tract to drill in

Why Catawba scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Catawba
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
10.9% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Catawba
6.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Catawba
6.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Catawba
7.1

How Catawba compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Catawba risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 011501Catawba: 2.72.7Catawbaparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 307Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 5.79%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.3%Peak (2014)
  • 18Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 370350115012002: 22 filings (7.10/100 renter HHs)2003: 27 filings (8.71/100 renter HHs)2004: 22 filings (7.10/100 renter HHs)2005: 18 filings (5.86/100 renter HHs)2006: 19 filings (6.19/100 renter HHs)2007: 23 filings (7.49/100 renter HHs)2008: 16 filings (5.21/100 renter HHs)2009: 20 filings (6.51/100 renter HHs)2010: 12 filings (3.23/100 renter HHs)2011: 16 filings (4.17/100 renter HHs)2012: 16 filings (4.17/100 renter HHs)2013: 15 filings (3.91/100 renter HHs)2014: 28 filings (7.29/100 renter HHs)2015: 26 filings (6.77/100 renter HHs)2017: 9 filings (2.98/100 renter HHs)2018: 18 filings (5.96/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 18% over the past 16 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Catawba

What moves this score most is housing court bias at 7.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Catawba, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Catawba County average of 5.0 and above the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 307 eviction filings here over 16 tracked years, with about 5.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 7.3% of renter households in 2014.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.1% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 37035011501

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37035011501?

Census tract 37035011501 in Catawba scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 37035011501?

10.9% of residents in tract 37035011501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,737.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 37035011501?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 50th, household 58th, minority 25th, housing 52th.
Q4

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37035011501?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 307 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 37035011501 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.79% of renter households, peaking at 7.3% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q5

What share of households in tract 37035011501 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 37035011501 compare to Catawba overall?

Tract 37035011501 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Catawba at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Catawba; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related