Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #54,934 of 84,120 nationally

Conover Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 37035010102 · Catawba County, NC · pop 4,338 · 45% of tract blocks fall in Conover

Eviction risk in Conover centers on tract 37035010102, which scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 4,338 residents. That is riskier than roughly 28% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

23% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $818 a month against an average household income of $68,750 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. Renters make up 26% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 20% Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units1,959
Renter share26.4%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate8.4%
Median income$68,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Conover
Low
Within county
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#25 of 34 tracts In Catawba County
Low
Within state
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#1,693 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Low
National
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#54,934 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Conover and the region

Centroid at 35.7173, -81.1720 · click any tract to drill in

Why Conover scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Conover
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.1
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
8.4% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$818 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Conover
5.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Conover
6.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Conover
5.9

How Conover compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Conover risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.23.2This tracttract 010102Conover: 2.42.4Conoverparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 58

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 253Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 4.40%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.3%Peak (2008)
  • 6Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 370350101022002: 15 filings (4.45/100 renter HHs)2003: 14 filings (4.15/100 renter HHs)2004: 14 filings (4.15/100 renter HHs)2005: 18 filings (6.23/100 renter HHs)2006: 14 filings (4.84/100 renter HHs)2007: 14 filings (4.84/100 renter HHs)2008: 27 filings (9.34/100 renter HHs)2009: 14 filings (4.84/100 renter HHs)2010: 20 filings (4.12/100 renter HHs)2011: 16 filings (3.25/100 renter HHs)2012: 13 filings (2.64/100 renter HHs)2013: 24 filings (4.87/100 renter HHs)2014: 9 filings (1.83/100 renter HHs)2015: 21 filings (4.26/100 renter HHs)2017: 14 filings (4.65/100 renter HHs)2018: 6 filings (1.99/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 60% over the past 16 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Conover

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 6.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Conover, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Catawba County average of 5.0 and below the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 58th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 37035010102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37035010102?

Census tract 37035010102 in Conover scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37035010102?

Median gross rent is $818/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37035010102?

8.4% of residents in tract 37035010102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,338.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37035010102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 31th, household 86th, minority 36th, housing 71th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37035010102?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 253 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 37035010102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.40% of renter households, peaking at 9.3% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

What share of households in tract 37035010102 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 37035010102 compare to Conover overall?

Tract 37035010102 scores 3.2/10, higher than the parent city of Conover at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Conover; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Conover

Top eight tracts in Conover ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related