Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally

Stedman Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 37051002801 · Cumberland County, NC · pop 4,251 · 39% of tract blocks fall in Stedman

Stedman anchors census tract 37051002801, which lands at 4.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 21% of renter households, a modest level, and 8% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $893 a month while the average household earns $95,000 a year, roughly 11% of income at the averages. Renters make up 14% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 11% Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,600
Renter share13.6%
SVI overall0.16
Poverty rate6.9%
Median income$95,000

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Stedman
Very Low
Within county
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#81 of 81 tracts In Cumberland County
Very Low
Within state
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#2,258 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Very Low
National
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#69,776 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Stedman and the region

Centroid at 35.0036, -78.7215 · click any tract to drill in

Why Stedman scores 2.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Stedman
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
6.9% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$893 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Stedman
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Stedman
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Stedman
2.9

How Stedman compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Stedman risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.32.3This tracttract 002801Stedman: 2.32.3Stedmanparent cityCounty: 4.64.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 16

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Stedman

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Stedman, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Cumberland County average of 5.4 and below the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 11.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 16th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 37051002801

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37051002801?

Census tract 37051002801 in Stedman scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37051002801?

Median gross rent is $893/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 21% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37051002801?

6.9% of residents in tract 37051002801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,251.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37051002801?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 16th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 7th, minority 50th, housing 32th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 37051002801 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 37051002801 compare to Stedman overall?

Tract 37051002801 scores 2.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Stedman at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Stedman; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Stedman

Top eight tracts in Stedman ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related